Post by Deleted on Jun 6, 2015 18:58:16 GMT
Getting back to the reward Russ Whitmeyer at one point was going to put up his house so that reward money would be made available. I don't understand why The Harringtons would pay $2 million to pass legislation regarding the DNA yet not leave a standing reward to catch Keith's killer?
Talk about priorities The United States Government had a $7 million reward for a man named Abu Ala al-Afri. He was killed in a drone strike so unfortunately no chance for an American citizen to pick up his M-16 and head off to Syria!!! Coincidentally there is still Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi where you can collect a cool $10 million. Good luck with that one!!!
I caused a debate on here labeling ONS a domestic terrorist. Since then I have seen at least 50 quotes labeling him a terrorist. What do you call him? A friendly neighbor? Part of the Citizens Watch program?
I am being facetious of course but you see how a label can mean the difference between ZERO in reward money and $10 million?
Take your pick do you want ONS' head or al-Bagdadi's? I will take both but the U.S already had al-Baghdadi in custody and released him because he has wasn't considered a "high-risk" priority! Now he is the leader of Isis. Wooops!!!
Lets try contacting our local congressmen and educate them about the domestic terriorist who roamed our streets (not Syria's) and raped/murderered American citizens in 1970s and 1980s.
Lets try this and see if we will get a cool Mil? ONS is not even on a no-fly list!!!!
A reward is a good idea. If there were multiple actors during these crimes there's more of a chance that someone would flip on him now. If there's a "dead or alive" clause there's a chance family might seek to cash in. Can't hurt.