albion's material, articles and websites of interest...
Nov 16, 2015 21:04:41 GMT
Drifter likes this
Post by albion on Nov 16, 2015 21:04:41 GMT
So WAshington Post says the DNA matched Condit. And CBS news says it didnt. Do you think they might have taken the DNA from the wrong Gary Condit? I mean it was late at night, and it was dimly lit. Is that how the collection of DNA is supposed to go? When did Presumed Innocent get published? "OK. So I am going to pass this cotton swab through the back window of the Limo, and then roll up the window, and then you are going to do the swab, and then pass it back to me. OK? Just roll the window down when you are finished."
"About 10 p.m. on July 9, Gary Condit and his lawyer met lead Detective Ralph Durant in the dimly lit parking lot behind the Giant supermarket on Wisconsin Avenue near the National Cathedral. Cooler heads had prevailed, and Condit had agreed to give a DNA sample.
Durant used a cotton swab to quickly take a sample of saliva from the congressman's mouth. No words were exchanged. The procedure took less than a minute. The detective turned the sample over to the D.C. Police Mobile Crime Unit, which sent it to the FBI laboratory at Quantico for testing.
During their initial search of Chandra's apartment, D.C. police found a pair of black panties stained with semen. Prosecutors wanted to know if the semen belonged to Condit or if Chandra was seeing another man.
The DNA from Condit's saliva was compared with the DNA on the panties. It was a match.
To D.C. Chief of Detectives Jack Barrett, the match added little to the case. It just confirmed what he already knew: The congressman had been having an affair with the missing intern. Barrett thought Condit was simply trying to save his marriage and his political career."
I miss interpreted this. The DNA from the panties matched Condit. The DNA from the black running pants that Chandra Levy was wearing, and that had both legs tied into knots, that DNA is still unaccounted for. It didn't match Condit and it didn't match Guandique. So who does it match? I would ask someone to go back and test it but I am sure that they would just claim it had been lost. Oops.
Fact. There is no system designed by man that cant be corrupted by man. Law Enforcement included.
How much money was it worth for the Irvine Family to desist in its lawsuit against Donald Bren? Billions?
How inept was it not to have the murder weapon in the Vicki Morgan case analyzed?