Post by redding2 on Mar 15, 2018 18:10:25 GMT
Maybe he did #43. He can have it. I'd give him #24, too, but that one is hard to say it's not EAR. So #43 and some other crime we don't even know about. Because there is no way that I can imagine that any of the canonical EA victims would not realize they were being attacked and raped by a fourteen-fifteen year-old.
Shire Lane Man (6/22/78)
Context: Two days before EAR attacked on 6/24/78 on Rivendell Lane, this man was seen on nearby Shire Lane when a woman noticed him in her yard, peering into various windows. (Information from Portofleith).
Validity: As with many other composites, this depicts a suspicious man, not a direct sighting of EAR.
Context: Two days before EAR attacked on 6/24/78 on Rivendell Lane, this man was seen on nearby Shire Lane when a woman noticed him in her yard, peering into various windows. (Information from Portofleith).
Validity: As with many other composites, this depicts a suspicious man, not a direct sighting of EAR.
Nah. I just looked at that case, and there's no way a copycat did that one. If so, he got everything spot-on perfect. Every aspect of that crime was canonical EAR, save the supposed kindness he showed towards the female victim. Also, the suspect seen peeping into windows was described as a man, not a boy or teenager.
www.coldcase-earons.com/35.php
(HAP: The assailant was a white male, 5'10", and was thin to medium in build, with big thighs. He had a hairy butt, and his breath was very sour).
(HAP: The assailant was a white male, 5'10", and was thin to medium in build, with big thighs. He had a hairy butt, and his breath was very sour).
He had his jaw wired shut in 1981 but EAR's clinched teeth speech dates back to 1976.
Also, Ear didn't always speak with clenched teeth. He talked to himself in a rather more normal voice on occasion and in at least one phone call in 1978, he spoke in a more natural but perhaps "tougher" voice. That phone call has been authenticated by both the police and the victim.
Shore's a liar. Even if he did rape someone n Sacramento, I doubt he committed any of the canonical EAR crimes. Hard to see that, and it's hard to see how he would even know enough about EAR to make such a claim, unless he read ST or HAP. Someone should quiz him on EAR mo and signature. See what he says. I'd love to hear his response.