Post by femto on Jun 12, 2018 10:44:48 GMT
Your first words to me: "Then why didn't you catch him if it was so obvious? It was in the * newspaper, as well".
My first words to you: "Ok, let's agree to disagree then".
You were the only one being judgmental and passive aggressive 'since the very beginning'.
You are being a bit disingenuous here, don't you think? For one, even through what I said might have come across as a bit snarky, I genuinely wanted to know why you didn't catch him. And I mentioned the newspaper part because it was indeed in the newspaper and you didn't need the police in order to make the connection. After all, you said you were sure he was a cop, not me.
Second, generally you do this "Ok, let's agree to disagree then" and after that you proceed to sing the same old song, like this one post (where you obviously didn't add the cool bits).
But like I said before, let's agree to disagree. None of it really matters that much now anyway.
You think the police did a sterling job. I think they did a poor job.
You think the police did a sterling job. I think they did a poor job.
(Note: I cut a lot of your arguments afterwards. Don't need more to make my point).
Now when did I here said that the police did a sterling job? I said in numerous posts that I think the police made some mistakes, but I disagreed on the shoplifting. So you try to put words in my mouth that I never said.
Generally, when a person says "agree to disagree", the argument is over. The people having the arguments have said everything there is to say and they didn't manage to convince themselves. And I actually would have dropped it, but you kept arguing and arguing afterwards instead of doing what you promised to do - bury the argument. And when I instead buried it when I stopped arguing with you over it, you again went right back at it with "Why are you going over this again?" when I said nothing to you.
So yes, I am in the wrong, as I said in my previous post. But Drifter saw it fit to only criticize me when you did the absolute same thing, calling me a con merchant a number of times when you could see that in most of my posts I actually spend the time to politely explain to you why the shoplifting incident wouldn't have sent alarms to LE that DeAngelo is the EAR/ONS. You'd be surprised how often stuff like that happens.
And even in this post you keep proving my point. Ironizing me with this "since the very beginning".