Post by Deleted on Apr 16, 2014 0:08:18 GMT
Fourth, I think many people on the board are thinking too small, too local. They think that Pool and Crompton are the highest "powers that be". I certainly think they are sincere and honest. I absolutely do not think they are the "powers that be". Again my opinion ... both Pool and Crompton, and all the other LE people we regularly name on this board, are honest, sincere, and want the case solved, but ... all of them are relatively minor. Even they have a certain amount of tunnel vision. Think bigger.
I have a question about ST. Didn't ST mention that many of the LE thought at the time that GSK could have been a member of LE? Did they ever find anything to rule that possibility out? Has anyone on this board found anything to rule out this possibility? Do we have any evidence that there was only one person involved in the crimes? With all the different comps and POI's isn't there the slightest chance that more than one person was involved? And with the skills that GSK displayed, isn't it even more possible that GSK had some LE or Military background?
So by suggesting that someone in LE, military or Gov was involved in the obfuscation of GSK, am I not just continuing in the argument that LE began 35 years ago? And that Crompton himself described? If this is true, why are some of us amateurs so upset about this? Even they don't believe it to be true, and don't want to follow that line of thought, wouldn't they be thankful that someone is following up on it?