Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2014 0:02:59 GMT
First off let me say that this post is a bit hypocritical since I am personally in no position
to take the lead with a publicity campaign (due to time constraints, not unlike
most people on here I’m sure).
But who knows, maybe one of you are a teacher with your summers off
This is actually quite simple, at least in
terms of gaining the financing necessary.
As mentioned in Hot Prowl, there was a case down in Florida where a killer was
identified by his handwriting via a freeway billboard the local police force
financed (taxpayer). That got me to
thinking: Since it’s reasonable to
assume that, at the very least, the map found in Northern California - as well
as the “Is Ray There” audio clip – is likely that of EAR ONS (I said
likely), what if the same were to take
place on a Sacramento billboard. Not
only would this create driver awareness (plenty of 65 year olds on the road),
but it would initiate a media buzz there as well where actual tangible evidence
(voice and handwriting), not MO and sensationalized, indistinguishable hissing
movie bytes could be the focal point of a news broadcasts on local CBS, NBC,
Ripon affiliates, etc.
Three expenses would need to be covered: Cost
of billboard design, billboard advertising cost, and website design.
Crowdrise (www.crowdrise.com) is crowdsourcing
site that is used to raise money for charitable donations. A dedicated Facebook site would need to be
created. Social Media could be used to
promote the fundraising by everyone on this site, and everyone within their
network, spread through (donate and like) to everyone in their networks
infinium.
A police contact could be the admin and provide financial audit. The is of course a very simplified scenario and
there would need to be a lot more pieces but just an idea.
Perhaps someone like Michelle McNamara could help promote the Crowdrise campaign
(Crowdrise is just an example)....there are several others as well.
Is Ray There audio. Handwriting. These are tangible items, not “he could have
beens.” Yes, it’s been 35 years. Yes, that’s a long time. But Ear Ons is long gone and he’s not going
to slip up now.
The publicity from the billboard alone would be worth it.
The question is, does anyone (outside of this website and law enforcement) even
care anymore?
___________
Background on my thoughts on the importance of "Is Ray There"...
I live in Los Angeles and I watched the coverage on
multiple local channels following the paint theory story. I do not live
in Sacramento, but I have watched some of the past local Sac. news
coverage online as well. All of it is the same: The sensationalized
Gonna Kill You voice, the MO, signature, where he's attacked, etc. Ad
nauseum, the same info over and over again. Or just theories. Paint?
Location? None of this means anything. There are a million reasons why
paint could be there, and who knows if EAR ONS ever actually moved from
Sacramento?
But you know what they likely do have? His voice
without disguise. The Gonna Kill You voice was verified by victims, And
if you listen to "Is Ray There" over and over again, it is a unique
voice. Somebody would recognize this. I am 41 and I can remember the
tonality and unique inflection/speech of close friends I had 25 years
ago; it's no different than celebrity voice overs on tv. I realize that
this audio is only a year old, but has this been broadcast on a Sac
channel? Any channel? To me, this is the best piece of evidence (outside
of DNA) in the case.
If a Kickstarter or some type of crowd
funding platform were to be utilized to create a Sacramento campaign,
say to ultimately drive traffic to a an EAR ONS site, this specific
audio would need to be the centerpiece. Do you know this killers voice?
Or maybe I just had too much coffee this afternoon lol
to take the lead with a publicity campaign (due to time constraints, not unlike
most people on here I’m sure).
But who knows, maybe one of you are a teacher with your summers off
This is actually quite simple, at least interms of gaining the financing necessary.
As mentioned in Hot Prowl, there was a case down in Florida where a killer was
identified by his handwriting via a freeway billboard the local police force
financed (taxpayer). That got me to
thinking: Since it’s reasonable to
assume that, at the very least, the map found in Northern California - as well
as the “Is Ray There” audio clip – is likely that of EAR ONS (I said
likely), what if the same were to take
place on a Sacramento billboard. Not
only would this create driver awareness (plenty of 65 year olds on the road),
but it would initiate a media buzz there as well where actual tangible evidence
(voice and handwriting), not MO and sensationalized, indistinguishable hissing
movie bytes could be the focal point of a news broadcasts on local CBS, NBC,
Ripon affiliates, etc.
Three expenses would need to be covered: Cost
of billboard design, billboard advertising cost, and website design.
Crowdrise (www.crowdrise.com) is crowdsourcing
site that is used to raise money for charitable donations. A dedicated Facebook site would need to be
created. Social Media could be used to
promote the fundraising by everyone on this site, and everyone within their
network, spread through (donate and like) to everyone in their networks
infinium.
A police contact could be the admin and provide financial audit. The is of course a very simplified scenario and
there would need to be a lot more pieces but just an idea.
Perhaps someone like Michelle McNamara could help promote the Crowdrise campaign
(Crowdrise is just an example)....there are several others as well.
Is Ray There audio. Handwriting. These are tangible items, not “he could have
beens.” Yes, it’s been 35 years. Yes, that’s a long time. But Ear Ons is long gone and he’s not going
to slip up now.
The publicity from the billboard alone would be worth it.
The question is, does anyone (outside of this website and law enforcement) even
care anymore?
___________
Background on my thoughts on the importance of "Is Ray There"...
I live in Los Angeles and I watched the coverage on
multiple local channels following the paint theory story. I do not live
in Sacramento, but I have watched some of the past local Sac. news
coverage online as well. All of it is the same: The sensationalized
Gonna Kill You voice, the MO, signature, where he's attacked, etc. Ad
nauseum, the same info over and over again. Or just theories. Paint?
Location? None of this means anything. There are a million reasons why
paint could be there, and who knows if EAR ONS ever actually moved from
Sacramento?
But you know what they likely do have? His voice
without disguise. The Gonna Kill You voice was verified by victims, And
if you listen to "Is Ray There" over and over again, it is a unique
voice. Somebody would recognize this. I am 41 and I can remember the
tonality and unique inflection/speech of close friends I had 25 years
ago; it's no different than celebrity voice overs on tv. I realize that
this audio is only a year old, but has this been broadcast on a Sac
channel? Any channel? To me, this is the best piece of evidence (outside
of DNA) in the case.
If a Kickstarter or some type of crowd
funding platform were to be utilized to create a Sacramento campaign,
say to ultimately drive traffic to a an EAR ONS site, this specific
audio would need to be the centerpiece. Do you know this killers voice?
Or maybe I just had too much coffee this afternoon lol
