Post by Deleted on Feb 12, 2015 23:19:55 GMT
Feb 12, 2015 22:44:44 GMT @privatecitizen said:
.....
Port, do you think that only one person did the VR crimes and do you think that the VR was the EAR?
same days of the week
same neighborhood
Snelling murder weapon stolen in ransacking
Snelling screen removed in same fashion as screen removal at other ransackings
physical description given by 7 witnesses
fondness for inexpensive jewelry, stamps and coins
interest in undies and lotion bottles
tennis shoe tracks the same at numerous ransack burglaries
left points of exit
methodically opened kitchen cupboards and refrigerators
removed, moved and tore photos of children and young women
I remain open to the VR being responsible for the EAR rapes, mainly due to uncertainty about the first possible crime dates in Sacramento. Many in LE and other case experts will disagree with me, but some of the above behaviors were similar at the EAR rapes and the murders.
For example, a screen was removed and placed on a bush at Offerman Manning. We know ONS opened the refrigerator at Offerman Manning. We assume he drank milk at the Smiths.
Early EAR victims described the "maniacal opening of kitchen cupboards and drawers." EAR moved food within refrigerators and counters. VR also did this.
Do we know that Patrice Harrington left groceries to put away on the kitchen counter or did ONS stage this?
ONS was also selective in the souvenirs he took and value was not a factor.
VR is the only cluster of crimes we are aware of that could pre-date the rapes. That is not to say there were not rapes elsewhere before June 18, 1976. In a perfect world, every old rape kit available would be processed for DNA.
I will say that most case experts seem to not believe that VR and EAR/ONS are one and the same. The apparent lack of DNA in the Tulare County crimes leaves this topic open for debate.