Post by lepke on Aug 24, 2015 0:05:46 GMT
"Merely" and "Likelihood" are both incredibly soft words. For you to have spent the enormous amount of time arguing for something which you can only define or quantify as "likely or unlikely" seems like a colossal waste of your efforts. It is a negative argument. And as long as the case is unsolved this argument will exist. Is the glass half empty or half full? IDK. If a tree falls in the woods....IDK Do these jeans make your butt look fat....IDK. What I do know is that I don't need you, or your silly and contradictory "connections", to continue on with my posts.
If you want to be taken seriously as a person of authority, stop with the failed humor, post your sources, and identify your self. Otherwise you are just another anonymous smartass with an opinion and a youtube account.
'Merely' and 'likelihood' are words that most adults who speak English don't have much trouble comprehending, but you obviously do, so I'll try and explain things to you in another way. Arguing that someone else has written that something is impossible, when they have only written it is improbable, is a deliberate misrepresentation of what they have written, for the purpose of making a straw man argument, so that you can portray someone with opposing views as closed-minded and unreasonable.
What a waste of your time and effort, to keep repeating the same nonsense, based on things that people haven't actually written. You need to understand that you have lost the argument. Plenty of posters like my humour, and if others don't, it doesn't bother me one bit. I don't have a YouTube account, just like I don't have a scooter, but it doesn't surprise me that you write absolute rubbish about me.
I mentioned that Quasar's 99% suspect has been cleared to be helpful, and also that I am not at liberty to reveal my sources, and no amount of childish whining is going to make me reveal them. Any adult with a good grip on reality, would understand why I may not be able to reveal my sources, and why I would be foolish to identify myself, something that you have not done yourself.
Your sources are often Wikipedia, and although I have posted that I find it tedious, perhaps your time on the board would be best spent concentrating on something simple, like copying and pasting large chunks of Wikipedia material onto your thread, even though it is rarely relevant to the EAR/ONS case. That way, you would avoid embarrassing yourself, by doing things like calling a psychology professor a moron, and attempting to win arguments with me, because I'm afraid you are well out of your depth when you try.
