EAR has a rock solid alibi but left too many clues.
Jul 13, 2016 21:18:42 GMT
albion, trabuco, and 1 more like this
Post by newbienew on Jul 13, 2016 21:18:42 GMT
The reason EAR hasn't been caught is not because he was never suspected.
Thats impossible 200-400 crimes counting VR and never get seen never get caught.
Seriously this isn't possible.
He was suspected probably early on and he had a rock solid alibi for being somewhere else at the time.
This opens a can of worms what kind of alibis are rock solid but also false?
For example,
If you got someone else to serve a jail sentence for you and you were "in" jail while you committed a rape or murder that would be a alibi that avoids DNA testing your blood.
If you were "dead" during one of the crimes that would be an alibi that would protect you from DNA. Or someone could take your dna and freeze it and then use it in a crime to make you appear not guilty if you were in fact dead.
If you were "out of state" in some activity with easily checked date ranges such as in school that would protect you from DNA
If you had a twin and thus had the ability to be two places at once that may shield you from giving DNA because you were at the other location and you can prove it.
If he was 5 years too young or 15 years too old he would be eliminated or maybe he was 6'2 but could walk with his knees permanently bent or back hunched during the crimes.
If the race or sex is somehow wrong you could sit on the street like a hobo a block from the crimes and no one would attach you to the crimes because the witness said white male.
If every single witness had some reason to not tell everything or some of them to tell a lie. If he was john holmes the "small penis" would be a pretty good alibi.
If you routinely had an alibi an hour before an hour away it would be hard to imagine that you drove all that distance in an hour. Because you have the ability to not commit the crime you would only commit the crime on the days that you traveled the distance quickly and were able to travel 1 hours worth of distance in 50 minutes or maybe even 40 minutes. This could be something like office hours for a professor which are posted and usually the professor is there but being 15 minutes late wouldn't be remembered long. If you lived 6 hours away and drove for 6 hours and gave up a full nights sleep each crime it would be very hard for anyone to pin that on you if you made it to work in the morning and no one remembers you being tired. And how long do you remember co-workers being tired?
If you were a police officer you could be a block away from all the crimes and no one would ever suspect you. You may have access to "add" evidence after the fact like scratching the window covers etc.
What mechanisms could give you this alibi?
Luck- someone remembering seeing you at a party you weren't at for example
Lies- A co-conspiriter who was willing to lie for you these lies can grow more powerful over time as they are not expected to remember the details anymore.
False witness- Did he have someone give evidence about him that was false to throw off the case? A single sketch of the wrong face could destroy the ability to filter on appearance.
Double- Some method of being in two places at the same time not all the crimes are DNA linked to 1 person. If you had twins who alternated so that one of them had a rock solid alibi at every rape/murder you would be unable to pin anything on them unless you could show which twin contributed the DNA.
Support- If you had someone give you all the information like someone hiring a hitman and providing a key to the house and schedule information etc. This frees you from the time consuming robberies and allows a single visit to be an alibi because multiple visits are thought required.
Structural misunderstanding- If you have a standing meeting that was published as MWF but was changed to TTH you would have an alibi that looked like you were always one place MWF when in fact you were not. This kind of alibi gets stronger with time as memories fade and published information starts to dominate.
Immunity- Someone who was supposed to be at those sites could be immune from consideration. Police, city workers, people who are supposed to be there mail man, garbage man etc.
Disguise- Was he bald? Did he have a mustache? Did he have some disguise that made him appear different in person than in EAR? A man wearing a fake mustache in real life every day would have a momento of his crimes every day with him that only he understood. Imagine your fake mustache IS your trophy. Or your brown contacts or died hair etc.
Now consider what permutations could you imagine?
A garbage man assassin manages to hide in the truck of a legit garbageman and wait there all day and gain access to the location even though the perimeter is well guarded and then commit the crime and flee to some other location where a similar trick can be applied. This may explain the time spent at the houses. Did his exit ride come on a schedule? Did he commute to the crime scene from a great distance? Did he have a alibi for where he was such as a wife, parents, roommates who saw him go to bed early the night before? You can start to imagine someone who could have had layers of alibi that would have all needed to fall for him to be a DNA level suspect. He could have his picture taken in sacramento and distributed but his mustache would protect him unless someone saw that picture who also knew his mustache was fake.
You can now start to see if someone was obsessed with ninjas or robbers and studied how to be a super criminal that it could be possible to develop an approach that has many layers each capable on its own of protecting EAR. But of course this approach requires PRACTICE, there would need to be a place where similar tactics were used at a much lower risk such as in Visalia.
But why stop there?
The Santa Rosa hitchhiker murders occurred just before VR. They are unique in that they are low skill murders. Victims willingly enter car/van, perhaps willingly get high and then they are killed in privacy of car/van and then thrown off the road in remote locations.
Before the Santa Rosa Hitchhiker was the Zodiac murders which look to me very similar to the VR/EAR crimes in terms of attraction to SDA locations and the murder victims seem to have drama with underworld figures. ONS victims seemed to know it was coming as did Zodiac victims. Zodiac drove up aimed and shot except in the Berryessa case where he used EAR tactics pre tied? ligatures woman ties up man etc wore a mask and attacked SDAs and used the phrase "now I need to stab you" which brings to mind a hitman who was requested to stab rather than shoot or strangle.
Before Zodiac was the manson family and the zebra killings. Both wanted to start the end of times and excite a race war. Zebra police coverage is very similar to EAR with files taken to personal homes and "lost" from police. Also both movements seem to have more murders than the convicted would seem to support as if there were team members who were never caught. Zodiac timeline seems to match santa rosa murders in terms of dates choose from occult calendars.
And before the Zodiac murders there was the 1966 Riverside murder of Cheri Bates, and the 1963 triple lompoc murders which were not particularly well executed but never talked about as a triple murder for some reason.
The starter murder would be one like the 1963 napa baby murder of Donna Heskett. This is a very low risk stop to pick up a kid and take her to a remote location or trick her into walking there herself. A three year old presents no physical risk to the attacker.
My thesis is that if you look at all of these murders as a faction that is slowly expanding its abilities it starts to make sense. The main thing stopping a murder is you not wanting to murder people, its not natural and the vast majority of people would not enjoy it. If EAR was actually born in 1950 he could have started in 1963 at 13 which is a reasonable early age to start killing and evidence suggests "sandy" was younger than the other two because they stiffed him on a fair share of the money after they saw him murder someone. He had trouble killing Bates at 16 and could have joined the Manson family at 17-18 and been a full Zodiac at 18-20. Low skill murders with an easy twist at 22-24 during the Santa Rosa hitch hiker murders but without any of the glory. Then a commitment to serious training in Visalia at 24-25. Sacramento he would be 26-30 then 30-31 for SB killings and he would be 36 for Cruz and starting to slow down. These dates could be easily pushed out 10 years if he was born in 1940 and 23 at first murders and ended with Cruz at 46.
The VR was at least 12 years old so he must have been born by 1962 which would put him at least 14 at start of EAR and 18-19 at end of EAR. ONS at 18-19 and Cruz at 24.
However you break it EAR must have been VR because VR is the only area sufficient training opportunities were present for the layers upon layers of alibi and strategy that he would have needed to perform 200 break ins with at least 20-40 of them in an area that is expecting him. Once you have VR you have an age range that fits with the other unsolved crimes. Once you have the list of crimes there is a pattern that emerges.
The Heskett girl's mother worked in a hospital perhaps at the same time as the Davis girl's mother/grandmother Davis was also SDA and was murdered, was that connected?
EAR had a witness who was killed by Gallego who happened to kill in the same city using rape torture and murder tactics was that connected?
1974 Rancho Cordova bank robbery where police made himself a hostage for a Madigan related to a Doyle which is a name connected to a ONS murder of Smith who had murdered brother in law from pervious marriage who was Doyle was that connected?
1975 SLA bank robbery killed an SDA who's children were at sacramento union academy during the EAR ear of around the same age was that related?
There are multiple MULTIPLE no stronger than that SEMINAL connections between individuals who attended PUC in 1968 during the zodiac Berryessa attack and sacramento union academy union academy just before and during 1976-1980 EAR era was that connected?
Did Zodiac follow someone from PUC to sacramento like EAR followed Glasby to SB and if so is that connected?
Was the Jr. person mentioned in the Zodiac ciphers by name ,who married a ham operator woman from just outside Visalia, framed by both the Zodiac and the EAR and if so is that connected?
here are just too many links for it all to be random.
Zodiac/Santa Rosa were using satanic/occult dates to commit murders. Zodiac victims knew they were targeted.
Visalia and EAR are just too obviously a continuation of the same persons MO and tactics most blatant of which is a break in thief not stealing!!! and I suspect the honesty of anyone who says otherwise.
EAR and the 1963 murders both have burnt matches for some reason.
There is migration of peripheral POIs in the cases to the same few cities which are NOT large population centers.
Zodiac and EAR and ONS all managed to involved the SDA church for some reason at a much higher rate than normal independent of all other factors.
Zodiac mentioned SLA in his letter and Carmichael SLA murder killed Sacramento Union Academy parent.
A large fraction of all the Zodiac, ONS murders appear to be good fits for hits. Zodiac killed people others wanted dead, ONS killed several people others wanted dead or had immediate drama directly before death, Smith, Cruz, Manning/Offerman, Glasby. And Sanchez suspected strongly enough to attack a man with a gun which could easily have been because he knew it was comming.
Its funny that Zodiac suspect Allen was in Lompoc in 1963 , Riverside in 1966, Vallejo 1969-1970, Santa Rosa 1972-1974 but was excluded as a Zodiac suspect. But he was a child molester, could he have been a non killing member of the same faction as zodiac and EAR? And EAR seems to have followed Brett Glasby from sac to Santa Barbara and then to Mexico to kill him. Its like there is an organization that is stalking individuals from one location to the next for some reason. Everywhere Allen went or Glasby went there were victims but it wasn't from them personally. This is a very strange thing linking two crime sprees that span a single possible lifetime. And in the EAR case we know it was one person not a bunch of murders glued together to look like one person.
If you step back and say EAR isn't one person things become clearly linked. Then you step forward and although all of those things continue to be linked its not absolutely clear that more than one person is necessary to achieve all of it.
Thats impossible 200-400 crimes counting VR and never get seen never get caught.
Seriously this isn't possible.
He was suspected probably early on and he had a rock solid alibi for being somewhere else at the time.
This opens a can of worms what kind of alibis are rock solid but also false?
For example,
If you got someone else to serve a jail sentence for you and you were "in" jail while you committed a rape or murder that would be a alibi that avoids DNA testing your blood.
If you were "dead" during one of the crimes that would be an alibi that would protect you from DNA. Or someone could take your dna and freeze it and then use it in a crime to make you appear not guilty if you were in fact dead.
If you were "out of state" in some activity with easily checked date ranges such as in school that would protect you from DNA
If you had a twin and thus had the ability to be two places at once that may shield you from giving DNA because you were at the other location and you can prove it.
If he was 5 years too young or 15 years too old he would be eliminated or maybe he was 6'2 but could walk with his knees permanently bent or back hunched during the crimes.
If the race or sex is somehow wrong you could sit on the street like a hobo a block from the crimes and no one would attach you to the crimes because the witness said white male.
If every single witness had some reason to not tell everything or some of them to tell a lie. If he was john holmes the "small penis" would be a pretty good alibi.
If you routinely had an alibi an hour before an hour away it would be hard to imagine that you drove all that distance in an hour. Because you have the ability to not commit the crime you would only commit the crime on the days that you traveled the distance quickly and were able to travel 1 hours worth of distance in 50 minutes or maybe even 40 minutes. This could be something like office hours for a professor which are posted and usually the professor is there but being 15 minutes late wouldn't be remembered long. If you lived 6 hours away and drove for 6 hours and gave up a full nights sleep each crime it would be very hard for anyone to pin that on you if you made it to work in the morning and no one remembers you being tired. And how long do you remember co-workers being tired?
If you were a police officer you could be a block away from all the crimes and no one would ever suspect you. You may have access to "add" evidence after the fact like scratching the window covers etc.
What mechanisms could give you this alibi?
Luck- someone remembering seeing you at a party you weren't at for example
Lies- A co-conspiriter who was willing to lie for you these lies can grow more powerful over time as they are not expected to remember the details anymore.
False witness- Did he have someone give evidence about him that was false to throw off the case? A single sketch of the wrong face could destroy the ability to filter on appearance.
Double- Some method of being in two places at the same time not all the crimes are DNA linked to 1 person. If you had twins who alternated so that one of them had a rock solid alibi at every rape/murder you would be unable to pin anything on them unless you could show which twin contributed the DNA.
Support- If you had someone give you all the information like someone hiring a hitman and providing a key to the house and schedule information etc. This frees you from the time consuming robberies and allows a single visit to be an alibi because multiple visits are thought required.
Structural misunderstanding- If you have a standing meeting that was published as MWF but was changed to TTH you would have an alibi that looked like you were always one place MWF when in fact you were not. This kind of alibi gets stronger with time as memories fade and published information starts to dominate.
Immunity- Someone who was supposed to be at those sites could be immune from consideration. Police, city workers, people who are supposed to be there mail man, garbage man etc.
Disguise- Was he bald? Did he have a mustache? Did he have some disguise that made him appear different in person than in EAR? A man wearing a fake mustache in real life every day would have a momento of his crimes every day with him that only he understood. Imagine your fake mustache IS your trophy. Or your brown contacts or died hair etc.
Now consider what permutations could you imagine?
A garbage man assassin manages to hide in the truck of a legit garbageman and wait there all day and gain access to the location even though the perimeter is well guarded and then commit the crime and flee to some other location where a similar trick can be applied. This may explain the time spent at the houses. Did his exit ride come on a schedule? Did he commute to the crime scene from a great distance? Did he have a alibi for where he was such as a wife, parents, roommates who saw him go to bed early the night before? You can start to imagine someone who could have had layers of alibi that would have all needed to fall for him to be a DNA level suspect. He could have his picture taken in sacramento and distributed but his mustache would protect him unless someone saw that picture who also knew his mustache was fake.
You can now start to see if someone was obsessed with ninjas or robbers and studied how to be a super criminal that it could be possible to develop an approach that has many layers each capable on its own of protecting EAR. But of course this approach requires PRACTICE, there would need to be a place where similar tactics were used at a much lower risk such as in Visalia.
But why stop there?
The Santa Rosa hitchhiker murders occurred just before VR. They are unique in that they are low skill murders. Victims willingly enter car/van, perhaps willingly get high and then they are killed in privacy of car/van and then thrown off the road in remote locations.
Before the Santa Rosa Hitchhiker was the Zodiac murders which look to me very similar to the VR/EAR crimes in terms of attraction to SDA locations and the murder victims seem to have drama with underworld figures. ONS victims seemed to know it was coming as did Zodiac victims. Zodiac drove up aimed and shot except in the Berryessa case where he used EAR tactics pre tied? ligatures woman ties up man etc wore a mask and attacked SDAs and used the phrase "now I need to stab you" which brings to mind a hitman who was requested to stab rather than shoot or strangle.
Before Zodiac was the manson family and the zebra killings. Both wanted to start the end of times and excite a race war. Zebra police coverage is very similar to EAR with files taken to personal homes and "lost" from police. Also both movements seem to have more murders than the convicted would seem to support as if there were team members who were never caught. Zodiac timeline seems to match santa rosa murders in terms of dates choose from occult calendars.
And before the Zodiac murders there was the 1966 Riverside murder of Cheri Bates, and the 1963 triple lompoc murders which were not particularly well executed but never talked about as a triple murder for some reason.
The starter murder would be one like the 1963 napa baby murder of Donna Heskett. This is a very low risk stop to pick up a kid and take her to a remote location or trick her into walking there herself. A three year old presents no physical risk to the attacker.
My thesis is that if you look at all of these murders as a faction that is slowly expanding its abilities it starts to make sense. The main thing stopping a murder is you not wanting to murder people, its not natural and the vast majority of people would not enjoy it. If EAR was actually born in 1950 he could have started in 1963 at 13 which is a reasonable early age to start killing and evidence suggests "sandy" was younger than the other two because they stiffed him on a fair share of the money after they saw him murder someone. He had trouble killing Bates at 16 and could have joined the Manson family at 17-18 and been a full Zodiac at 18-20. Low skill murders with an easy twist at 22-24 during the Santa Rosa hitch hiker murders but without any of the glory. Then a commitment to serious training in Visalia at 24-25. Sacramento he would be 26-30 then 30-31 for SB killings and he would be 36 for Cruz and starting to slow down. These dates could be easily pushed out 10 years if he was born in 1940 and 23 at first murders and ended with Cruz at 46.
The VR was at least 12 years old so he must have been born by 1962 which would put him at least 14 at start of EAR and 18-19 at end of EAR. ONS at 18-19 and Cruz at 24.
However you break it EAR must have been VR because VR is the only area sufficient training opportunities were present for the layers upon layers of alibi and strategy that he would have needed to perform 200 break ins with at least 20-40 of them in an area that is expecting him. Once you have VR you have an age range that fits with the other unsolved crimes. Once you have the list of crimes there is a pattern that emerges.
The Heskett girl's mother worked in a hospital perhaps at the same time as the Davis girl's mother/grandmother Davis was also SDA and was murdered, was that connected?
EAR had a witness who was killed by Gallego who happened to kill in the same city using rape torture and murder tactics was that connected?
1974 Rancho Cordova bank robbery where police made himself a hostage for a Madigan related to a Doyle which is a name connected to a ONS murder of Smith who had murdered brother in law from pervious marriage who was Doyle was that connected?
1975 SLA bank robbery killed an SDA who's children were at sacramento union academy during the EAR ear of around the same age was that related?
There are multiple MULTIPLE no stronger than that SEMINAL connections between individuals who attended PUC in 1968 during the zodiac Berryessa attack and sacramento union academy union academy just before and during 1976-1980 EAR era was that connected?
Did Zodiac follow someone from PUC to sacramento like EAR followed Glasby to SB and if so is that connected?
Was the Jr. person mentioned in the Zodiac ciphers by name ,who married a ham operator woman from just outside Visalia, framed by both the Zodiac and the EAR and if so is that connected?
here are just too many links for it all to be random.
Zodiac/Santa Rosa were using satanic/occult dates to commit murders. Zodiac victims knew they were targeted.
Visalia and EAR are just too obviously a continuation of the same persons MO and tactics most blatant of which is a break in thief not stealing!!! and I suspect the honesty of anyone who says otherwise.
EAR and the 1963 murders both have burnt matches for some reason.
There is migration of peripheral POIs in the cases to the same few cities which are NOT large population centers.
Zodiac and EAR and ONS all managed to involved the SDA church for some reason at a much higher rate than normal independent of all other factors.
Zodiac mentioned SLA in his letter and Carmichael SLA murder killed Sacramento Union Academy parent.
A large fraction of all the Zodiac, ONS murders appear to be good fits for hits. Zodiac killed people others wanted dead, ONS killed several people others wanted dead or had immediate drama directly before death, Smith, Cruz, Manning/Offerman, Glasby. And Sanchez suspected strongly enough to attack a man with a gun which could easily have been because he knew it was comming.
Its funny that Zodiac suspect Allen was in Lompoc in 1963 , Riverside in 1966, Vallejo 1969-1970, Santa Rosa 1972-1974 but was excluded as a Zodiac suspect. But he was a child molester, could he have been a non killing member of the same faction as zodiac and EAR? And EAR seems to have followed Brett Glasby from sac to Santa Barbara and then to Mexico to kill him. Its like there is an organization that is stalking individuals from one location to the next for some reason. Everywhere Allen went or Glasby went there were victims but it wasn't from them personally. This is a very strange thing linking two crime sprees that span a single possible lifetime. And in the EAR case we know it was one person not a bunch of murders glued together to look like one person.
If you step back and say EAR isn't one person things become clearly linked. Then you step forward and although all of those things continue to be linked its not absolutely clear that more than one person is necessary to achieve all of it.