Post by drdoogie on Oct 23, 2016 16:27:29 GMT
The "best lead in 40 years" is the possible EAR attack in 1973 (prior to the development of his MO) where the perp was seen unmasked for six hours and let out many clues to his identity. The individuals listed as POIs are not the lead - it is the attack itself and the new clues that were found. MM and Shelby both believed that this was key to identifying EAR.
This was a kidnapper-rapist, and she went to the police, correct? I thought I read that.
And she's contacted Michelle, and Michelle took it seriously. So what jurisdiction did this happen in, and do they have the sketch or did Michelle have time to send this witness to someone who could sketch from her memory?
I realize memories are tricky, especially after so long. But this victim not only looked him in the face when he was telling his bogus story and trying to get her in the car, but she may have not been blindfolded during the six hour ordeal, is that right?
Was she, or not? Because I dont remember reading that detail.
She knew he was masturbating while driving. So how did she know that? Or that his penis was small? Both by sight?
How did the 6 hour ordeal break down? Did he drive two hours each way and was it a two hour physical assault? Or ...?
Was her sight obscured for any of it?
Was she tied?
If yes; how was she tied?
What did he say to her in that 6 hour ordeal, other than what he told her to get her to accept a ride with him?
Was she stalked before the kidnapping-rape? If yes, by what means was this determined, and how do you know that?
Any crank calls to her house?
All of this information must be known by you guys, right?
Was Michelle the only person that spoke to her?
Who else spoke to her? Shelby?
Shelby and a Sac official?
Any FBI personnel?
What happened when she was told that her name was leaked? How did she react? Did she stop cooperating, or has she given her story to LE with the authority to work the case?
Thanks.
Some confusion may have occurred because the fallout between MM and Shelby concerned an allegedly "leaked name" of a witness, but that was not concerning THIS witness.
I also want to give folks here a heads up: the victim being discussed in this thread is aware of what is posted here. Please keep this in mind when posting. She is a brave woman who could have kept all of this to herself, but chose to expose to others things that she would probably rather keep forgotten.