Post by biglebowskyoz on Sept 10, 2016 20:32:13 GMT
Hey Big, here's some friendly, constructive feedback on quoting posts from the A&E threads.
- Use the quote box for the A&E posts, not for your own comments.
- Provide a link to the thread you're quoting along with the name of that thread.
- Provide context with an introduction and subsequent commentary.
- Place your post, the one with the A&E quotation, into a relevant thread instead of starting a new one. (Maybe not always, but most of the time.)
- In the non-reformatted A&E threads, the poster's name will appear at the bottom, so look there.
I've been experimenting with various approaches. Here's one example, below.
Anybody else notice that the posts are undated in the old A&E threads? We have to infer the date by the content. Sometimes it's obvious, like in this one by the poster "setrepeoh." Usually not, though.Now here we are in 2016 and the case is apparently no closer to being solved. Interesting to see how various topics and points of view cycle through the community over time. Anyway, it would be helpful if Drifter would at least put the year at the top of each A&E set. Request respectfully submitted.I'm asking anyone, and everyone, what new clues have surfaced this past year. The book released hasn't had the results everyone expected. I believe there are unknown victims out there, who didn't come forward at the time. All that's needed is that one break. Plus, I think LE needs to comb through the first murder.
That first killing has significant information. I believe that one of the victims knew EAR/ONS, or, guessed who he was; thereby sealing their fate. There HAS to be a common factor EAR/ONS used in selecting his victims. No serial killer as well organized as EAR/ONS could have committed these crimes without careful, well thought out planning; including picking which person to target. The key to his identity may lie in the memories of neighbors, friends, relatives, and aquaintances.
The trail is not only cold, it's twisted and broken. So many leads were never followed due to the lack of funds, or, were discarded as unlikely possibilities. Investigators triage leads, like medics during a crisis situation. They pick the most likely possibilities and follow them. I'm not saying they weren't doing their best. Just stating their ways of following leads were clouded at the time by all the pressure they were under. It was,( and still is ), a big news media case.
Everyone feel free to voice their newly found information, and opinions here. I'd very much like to hear your ideas, and information to help close this case in 2011.
A&E Set 24: Closing out 2010...What have we learned? by setrepeoh
Ok I can certainly do most of that, only thing I'm not sure about is putting things in the right thread but you guys can help me as we go through it and we can get drifter to move it to the right thread.