Post by newbienew on Mar 4, 2017 2:20:04 GMT
The evidence supports helpers.
The evidence supports Gallegos as helpers who murdered a witness.
That doesn't mean it happened.
But its very rare for a witness of a random thing to be killed by a serial killer but VERY common if drugs or organized crime is involved.
You'd have to define how Kippi Vaught is a "witness" and how EAR/ONS identified and singled her out let alone involve Gallego and a drug connection. Gallego and his wife gave believable testimony that the murder of Vaught and her friend was a random one.
"Kippi Vaught was one of the kids outside the attempted attack on Revelstock Drive that were talking and making noise. This evidently spooked the EAR who left without assaulting the intended victim. I wasn't aware that she was a witness other than having that association. She was later abducted and killed by Gerald Gallegos."
I am using witness in the broadest sense. I do not mean she personally was able to identify EAR. But her and her friends interfered in his crime and he became a serial killer then later her and a friend are killed by a serial killer couple.
Witness in the broadest sense is that she witnesses his presence or absence outside the house during the crime. Her presence restricts his movements. Her presence restricts any helpers of his from picking him up etc. She messed with his Mojo so to speak. You can witness the absence of someone at a given time and location and still be a witness in the broadest sense. She was in a location of interest close enough to affect the outcome of the crime and thus witnessed his absence and possibly his presence as he left.
Having two serial killers, who are not organized crime related, linked by an individual who witnesses one and murdered by another is an EXTREMELY rare event. On par with an individual's own personal odds of being murdered by a serial killer.
Changing from a human to your own fictional pet lion. If I told you on 10/21/77 and a small group of people that I was a lion murderer and was going to strike and then your pet lion was actually murdered on 9/11/78, what are the odds that what I said and the lion being murdered were totally unrelated? How would you react if you went to the police to report me as a suspect and they said "first you need to establish if your lion really saw his face".
First, for me to come in contact with you and announce that I am a lion murderer is a VERY rare event. Coming into close contact with a serial killer during an actual crime and altering the crime is a VERY VERY rare event.
Second for a lion murder to occur we can pretend is just as unlikely as a human murder. For your lion to be murdered by a lion serial killer which makes up only 1% of lion murders and it NOT instigated be me after giving you a warning is insanely unlikely.
That is how rare the event is. It should be of the top 3-5 things in this case. It makes it VERY VERY VERY VERY unlikely that Gallegos and EAR weren't linked. Unlikely enough that if the police told me they were not linked I would feel confident that the police were compromised before I would question the linkage.