Post by thekevin on Aug 26, 2017 8:57:44 GMT
Sometimes described as 3 inches and thick, other times 5 inches with diameter like a roll of quarters. Nobody gets 6 inches confused with 8 inches. That's a really distinct difference. In the first dna case the rapist was desribed with some belly and a double chin. That thin wiry guy from the full body sketch didn't gain weight in 1-2 years with all the prowling, burglaries, rapes and getaways he committed while under constant stress. The Ripon Court shooter and the Maggiore shooter look absolutely nothing alike other than both white. Yet, they both made the FBI sketch release. That thin wiry guy from full body sketch would never be described as stocky, yet several victims described a stocky rapist.
The women's hands bound behind their back of course makes it hard to measure the exact length and thickness. So it's hard ton say correct figures. Their words are more like guesses. The common thing about his penis is that it's small, and that's the important information.
Same goes for composite sketches. You can't take them like accurate photographs. First we don't really know for sure which reflects the very EAR's face. Second, even if all of them'd show EAR better don't forget witnesses subjectiv perception. People lay stress on different aspects.
A very good example is the roaming rapist. In the link below you see an actual picture of him and further below are 4 sketches of him. These 4 sketches don't look alike to each other and no one looks like the actual guy. I had never make the connection if I had known this guy.
So same could count for EAR.
www.google.de/amp/sacramento.cbslocal.com/2012/11/09/sacramento-county-sheriff-roaming-rapist-in-custody/amp/