Post by Deleted on Jan 10, 2018 6:43:41 GMT
Jan 5, 2018 7:50:02 GMT ajt said:
Thought of EAR/GSK this evening when watching the movie Mr. Brooks (Kevin Costner plays the serial killer) and his wanna be accomplice (Dane Cook) says "can we kill somebody I know?" Costner (Mr. Brooks) says "No. Never kill anyone that you know. That's the easiest way to get caught."Maybe EAR/GSK never had face to face interaction with his victims prior to the attack(s).
Maybe that was his whole strategy. Victims (the one's that lived) could rattle off a list of 20 people they know that could have attacked them and his name would never appear...
While no one can say for certain what EARONS thought, this is a great idea and despite the Hangman's subplot being distracting from the film, it did demonstrate the outcome of attacking people you know. Everyone that guy knew was either seduced or targeted by him, he was ultimately exposed and spent his duration as a fugitive. It actually aides in your theory.
A better movie however that demonstrates this idea is HENRY: PORTRAIT OF A SERIAL KILLER. Based on the false stories strewn by the actual serial killer Henry Lee Lucas, the film stars Michael Rooker as drifter and ex-con Henry Lucas who kills people randomly and without discrimination. He never kills someone he knows, which he teaches to rapist Otis Toole(Tom Towles) when grooming him to join his murderous rampages. This film takes away the hollywood flash and replaces it with an almost too realistic, heart stopping ferociousness that psychiatrists have claimed to be the most genuine portrayal of a psychotpath in cinema.
For Mr Brooks, the thing I took away from it as a possibility for EARONS more than anything was that he destroyed the items that he removed from the home after committing his crimes. This includes the pictures he took, clothes he wore, tools he used, etc. Today, following the revelation of the plates, I actually feel quite the opposite now as far as EARONS is concerned. The man was far too enamored with his victims lives to remove the sentimental aspect, though that is only my opinion.
Great thread