Holes finds Marital Arrangement “Suspicious”

[mmchris]

May 8, 2018 10:12:19 GMT lawyerup916 said:

Hello everyone. I am new to the forums, I actually found them today on a link on a SacBee facebook post. I'm in my mid-30's born and raised here in Sacramento. Never really heard about this case until the arrest honestly. I was reading this board at around 1am and saw the name Sharon Huddle. I should preface and say I worked in family law from 2002-2008. My mom also worked in family law for 30+ years (and helped me get my job at the law firm I worked at). Sharon Huddle, I recognized the name right away. So I called my mom at 1:30am (I knew she'd be up) and asked if Sharon Huddle was the crazy attorney she had worked for. I know people aren't going to believe me, but my mom worked for her for 3 days. She was so * crazy my mom quit after 3 days! Sharon Huddle isn't some meek/weak woman. She is aggressive and used bully tactics with opposing attorneys. The last straw for my mom was when Sharon used the bathroom in the office with the door open while still talking to my mom. At the time my mom was desperate for a job but quit because this woman was just too crazy. Our opinion is she has to know something. Also, my mom said Sharon is definitely narcissistic too. She "complained" about how expensive the prestigious college her youngest daughter was going to. She also said there were newspaper/magazine clippings framed in the office of her time as an attorney in Los Angeles and she is trying to see if she can find them online. She also tried to trash talk about other attorneys my mom knew and called them stupid. My mom isn't sure what the point of that was. Did she want her to agree? Maybe she is just bat * crazy? I also saw this article tonight and this lines up more with the Sharon Huddle we know. www.ocregister.com/2018/04/26/golden-state-killer-neighbors-of-suspects-ex-wife-said-there-was-always-trouble/

Thanks for sharing!

[imagigator]

If she is as aggressive as some posts state she is, how do we know that JJD didn't take out those feelings on other women? There are statements that he is emotional and does not do well with criticism. He might have dealt with himself being subjugated by reciprocating said aggressive behavior on other innocent people that he could control. I am nowhere near certain in believing that she knew of or had involvement during the attacks. After the attacks ended is an entirely different story.

[mike]

IF she knew what he was up to (and I stress "if" because we don't know that) or, worse, was aiding him in these attacks then I'd go so far as to say she's even sicker than he is. Think about it. A woman with three young daughters aiding and abetting her husband in sexually assaulting other women. As bizarre as serial murderers are and as many crazy situations that have surfaced over the years, this might take the cake, if true.

And while I don't mean to fan flames here, the fact that Paul Holes commented on her as he did makes me think there's more to it. He doesn't seem like the type that would bring up a family member in this fashion if he didn't have a pretty good idea something was up.

[ijustwantthetruth]

May 8, 2018 17:43:42 GMT mike said:

IF she knew what he was up to (and I stress "if" because we don't know that) or, worse, was aiding him in these attacks then I'd go so far as to say she's even sicker than he is. Think about it. A woman with three young daughters aiding and abetting her husband in sexually assaulting other women. As bizarre as serial murderers are and as many crazy situations that have surfaced over the years, this might take the cake, if true.

And while I don't mean to fan flames here, the fact that Paul Holes commented on her as he did makes me think there's more to it. He doesn't seem like the type that would bring up a family member in this fashion if he didn't have a pretty good idea something was up.

With this case, it wouldn't surprise me. I agree, Paul Holes is a very smart man, he has to know what this implies. I don't think we'll ever see another perpetrator/perpetrators like this again in our life time. I truly believe this is a unique case all on it's own. 

[Deleted]

May 8, 2018 17:33:49 GMT imagigator said:

If she is as aggressive as some posts state she is, how do we know that JJD didn't take out those feelings on other women? There are statements that he is emotional and does not do well with criticism. He might have dealt with himself being subjugated by reciprocating said aggressive behavior on other innocent people that he could control. I am nowhere near certain in believing that she knew of or had involvement during the attacks. After the attacks ended is an entirely different story.

Nope. Sharon is not to blame here, regardless of how aggressive she may have been. 

[ijustwantthetruth]

May 8, 2018 10:12:19 GMT lawyerup916 said:

Hello everyone. I am new to the forums, I actually found them today on a link on a SacBee facebook post. I'm in my mid-30's born and raised here in Sacramento. Never really heard about this case until the arrest honestly. I was reading this board at around 1am and saw the name Sharon Huddle. I should preface and say I worked in family law from 2002-2008. My mom also worked in family law for 30+ years (and helped me get my job at the law firm I worked at). Sharon Huddle, I recognized the name right away. So I called my mom at 1:30am (I knew she'd be up) and asked if Sharon Huddle was the crazy attorney she had worked for. I know people aren't going to believe me, but my mom worked for her for 3 days. She was so * crazy my mom quit after 3 days! Sharon Huddle isn't some meek/weak woman. She is aggressive and used bully tactics with opposing attorneys. The last straw for my mom was when Sharon used the bathroom in the office with the door open while still talking to my mom. At the time my mom was desperate for a job but quit because this woman was just too crazy. Our opinion is she has to know something. Also, my mom said Sharon is definitely narcissistic too. She "complained" about how expensive the prestigious college her youngest daughter was going to. She also said there were newspaper/magazine clippings framed in the office of her time as an attorney in Los Angeles and she is trying to see if she can find them online. She also tried to trash talk about other attorneys my mom knew and called them stupid. My mom isn't sure what the point of that was. Did she want her to agree? Maybe she is just bat * crazy? I also saw this article tonight and this lines up more with the Sharon Huddle we know. www.ocregister.com/2018/04/26/golden-state-killer-neighbors-of-suspects-ex-wife-said-there-was-always-trouble/

Thank you for sharing this, giving us some insights.  It's very interesting to say the least. 

[superunknown]

It might be worthwhile to mention that in the State of California, you become eligible for a public employee pension (CALPERS) after five years in a job. Even if you're fired. So he likely also is getting a small CALPERS pension, which also includes good medical benefits, which I believe his spouse will also get too. I am speculating about this, of course.

It could also be (speculation again) that he worked and paid her way through law school and would be eligible for spousal support because he helped further her career. It could also be for tax or other reasons. It could also be because he's a f-ing psycho and it was easier to stay married to him out of fear. I realize that may seem unlikely given her supposedly tough public profile, but it wouldn't surprise me either. Women who live with sadistic narcissists for years get very broken down inside.

All speculation on my part.

[imagigator]

May 8, 2018 19:43:23 GMT @surfergirl said:

May 8, 2018 17:33:49 GMT imagigator said:

If she is as aggressive as some posts state she is, how do we know that JJD didn't take out those feelings on other women? There are statements that he is emotional and does not do well with criticism. He might have dealt with himself being subjugated by reciprocating said aggressive behavior on other innocent people that he could control. I am nowhere near certain in believing that she knew of or had involvement during the attacks. After the attacks ended is an entirely different story.

Nope. Sharon is not to blame here, regardless of how aggressive she may have been. 

I never said or even insinuated that she is responsible for the attacks. However, if you don't believe that relationships and how they can psychologically affect an offender to respond in certain ways towards others, you might want to read up on it. Who knows how their relationship really was and what went through the mind of JJD?

[sammyt]

May 8, 2018 1:43:42 GMT riverstorum said:

What does the Pope say about protecting serial killers and withholding comfort and absolution from their victims because you dont feel like inconveniencing yourself?

You might want to have a look at some of the hundreds of child rape crimes within the Catholic church where paedophile priests were protected from the very top.

Until five years ago, the age of consent in Vatican City was 12 for crying out loud.

[tourism]

May 8, 2018 17:43:42 GMT mike said:

IF she knew what he was up to (and I stress "if" because we don't know that) or, worse, was aiding him in these attacks then I'd go so far as to say she's even sicker than he is. Think about it. A woman with three young daughters aiding and abetting her husband in sexually assaulting other women. As bizarre as serial murderers are and as many crazy situations that have surfaced over the years, this might take the cake, if true.

And while I don't mean to fan flames here, the fact that Paul Holes commented on her as he did makes me think there's more to it. He doesn't seem like the type that would bring up a family member in this fashion if he didn't have a pretty good idea something was up.

I disagree. I think that the guy doing the assaults/murders is still the worse party in this scenario.

[tourism]

May 8, 2018 10:12:19 GMT lawyerup916 said:

Hello everyone. I am new to the forums, I actually found them today on a link on a SacBee facebook post. I'm in my mid-30's born and raised here in Sacramento...

in summary: your mom worked with Sharon Huddle for three days. Sharon Huddle was an aggressive family lawyer who complained about other attorneys and her daughter's high tuition fees (like narcissism personified..). Also she talked to your mom while she peed.

And all of this leads you to believe that she's crazy and had to know what was up. Unless I'm mistaken all there really seems to be about Sharon Huddle (and it is only 2 weeks post-arrest) is anecdotes about her being weird or a * and paul holes' 'looks kinda hinky'. So yeah, probably not going to buy a pitchfork yet.

[Deleted]

May 8, 2018 20:45:09 GMT tourism said:

May 8, 2018 10:12:19 GMT lawyerup916 said:

Hello everyone. I am new to the forums, I actually found them today on a link on a SacBee facebook post. I'm in my mid-30's born and raised here in Sacramento...

in summary: your mom worked with Sharon Huddle for three days. Sharon Huddle was an aggressive family lawyer who complained about other attorneys and her daughter's high tuition fees (like narcissism personified..). Also she talked to your mom while she peed.

And all of this leads you to believe that she's crazy and had to know what was up. Unless I'm mistaken all there really seems to be about Sharon Huddle (and it is only 2 weeks post-arrest) is anecdotes about her being weird or a * and paul holes' 'looks kinda hinky'. So yeah, probably not going to buy a pitchfork yet.

I don't understand why complaining about tuition is crazy

[brawlpups]

May 8, 2018 3:00:41 GMT rkz said:

I wonder about her anti-surrogacy activism. What is that about? Is this a pressing issue for her; i.e. is it personal?

I guess my question is what is the anture of her beliefs regarding anti-surrogacy. It would suggest a religious beief maybe?

[oldguy]

May 8, 2018 4:51:24 GMT hoxtontom said:

May 7, 2018 21:52:36 GMT loveliftedme said:

“I’m very well aware they are estranged,” Holes said on the panel in Nashville. “It’s an unusual situation that someone so well versed in the divorce process has chosen not to have completed that process, and it becomes suspicious. I cannot go into any more detail than that at this time

www.oxygen.com/crime-time/golden-state-killer-joseph-deangelo-sharon-huddle-divorce

Has this been posted yet?

dailygrindredefined.com/2018/04/29/goldenstatekiller/

The blogger claims to be a family attorney who has lived near DeAngelo her whole life and knows Sharron Huddle well. She is interviewing area residents and is going to post what the locals are saying. Her theory is that Sharron must have known.

Thank you for this find...am I crazy or did the blogger not say that Sharon and JJD separated  9 months ago? That would be contrary to everything else I have read.

[walter]

May 8, 2018 21:16:16 GMT oldguy said:

May 8, 2018 4:51:24 GMT hoxtontom said:

Has this been posted yet?

dailygrindredefined.com/2018/04/29/goldenstatekiller/

The blogger claims to be a family attorney who has lived near DeAngelo her whole life and knows Sharron Huddle well. She is interviewing area residents and is going to post what the locals are saying. Her theory is that Sharron must have known.

Thank you for this find...am I crazy or did the blogger not say that Sharon and JJD separated  9 months ago? That would be contrary to everything else I have read.

Legal separation is not legal divorce.