was there a second killer working parallel to EARONS?
Feb 12, 2019 14:23:47 GMT
kg and jayvee1012 like this
Post by walter on Feb 12, 2019 14:23:47 GMT
It’s actually a scientific fact that eye witness accounts are unreliable.
It was one person and one a lone. No one shares so many incredibly unique fetishes and mo. His script was so specific, consistent and for him. No one will share it.
Got to add this, but just some thoughts: My understanding is that scientific findings are actually more nuanced than simply that all eye witness accounts are unreliable. I agree that many are unreliable and personally feel that all deserve considerable scrutiny before potentially being accepted as accurate. But that doesn't mean eye witness accounts are always unreliable. Multiple factors combine to determine whether a particular eye witness account is unreliable or reliable.
True - some of them were quite accurate (imo) in representing JJD. Others varied wildly. Human memory as a whole is not reliable and is fairly mutable. Sketches are another layer of uncertainty because now you are relying on an individual's unreliable memory, their ability to verbally interpret an image they have and a sketch artist's ability to work well with that person. This doesn't even get into the assumptions that some people hold that he wore disguises. It's tough.