Possible Connection between 1973 Sac and the VR?
Feb 28, 2018 14:20:42 GMT
via mobile
Sean Hogan, unknown, and 1 more like this
Post by silentscreams on Feb 28, 2018 14:20:42 GMT
I completely agree with this! The posters saying this evidence points away from VR either didn’t look at it/listen to it, or they have some kind of agenda to push. The facts of the case are there were/was (either one or multiple) offender(s) with very unique, specific, similar MO’s operating across multiple jurisdictions in California during non-overlapping time frames.
Based on this new evidence, the way I see it, either VR/cat burglar/EAR are one in the same (why can’t it be that), were trained in the same way/by same person or people (very possible imo), or were one hell of a coincidence (the least likely if all scenarios).
For those unreceptive of these conclusions, I have a question: “why CANT VR, EAR, Cat burglar, be the same guy?”
Fair enough, but to speculate: perhaps the incident where he almost got shot helped him to realize how out of control he had become and he took a break. Moved on to Visalia to start fresh.
He was keeping himself in check pretty well ransacking, but eventually he began to lose control again, and the shooting of Snelling was the climax (no pun) of that spree, which once again caused him to change locations/get ahold of himself before he wound up in jail or dead.
This time, when he resurfaced, he had experimented enough with what works and what doesn’t, and was self-aware enough to know he was no longer satisfied with prowling, he wanted to sexually assault women.
Speculation is just that, which is not reliable obviously...but my mind still goes back to “why can they NOT be the same offender”. Until now, I have not been on board with VR being EAR; but with these new revelations, I now am forced to ascribe to that idea, until evidence is shown that makes it impossible.