Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2015 10:53:04 GMT
Two offenders? Maybe. It would account for some of the variations in descriptions, mannerisms, etc. But, if the DNA only suggests one person, we'd have to account for why that is so. Did he not leave any DNA in some of the attacks and only then precisely when one of the offenders was involved? Has LE lost (or not collected) all and only the kits for one of the offenders? That would be hard to get right, if they were doing it on purpose, much less by accident.
Anyone can be a stooge for a crime and not know it, especially someone who can verify the presence of a hotel clerk or security guard who was there when in actuality, they were not. Now if it's someone as you said, who just passes by and finds no one at the No Tell? Then probably not, but it would depend on the actual person themselves and how they respond to being approached by LE. Of course these kind of examples will not suffice in the means which I may have thought you meant. In that instance, I apologize for getting it wrong. Thinking about it, I always thought that having a movie ticket would be a pretty clear way of singling out your location at the time of the crime personally, as it required no one to know you were there, just that you bought a ticket.