Post by Deleted on Oct 8, 2014 20:30:50 GMT
Most of the 1st year descriptions LE put out of EAR was that he had dark hair, dark eyes, and was 25-35 yrs. old. After that, the descriptions varied more, but it seems like the descriptions of a blond-haired, blue-eyed, younger EAR became more the norm. That shift in descriptions happened to coincide with Shipley and McGowen from Visalia going to Sacramento to discuss the VR case with them and their suspicions that VR had become EAR. They felt that one of their suspects that better matched the first year descriptions LE put out for EAR had likely morphed into being EAR.
Coincidence? Maybe.
Some LE thought EAR followed the press articles about him. If he did, he was probably aware that the press reported that Visalia LE had visited Sac LE to share info about their VR case.
Some LE thought EAR wore disguises. Crompton mentions that in ST. Would EAR have tried to alter his appearance to victims and to others while prowling to mislead if he suspected Visalia LE shared info about him or was there another reason?
Years later, Pool's unit in OC put out an alert to other LE agencies that the EAR/ONS offender had dark hair, dark eyes, and was on the younger end of the age spectrum with an estimated 4 year age range. Personally, I think only doing a 4 year age range was shooting themselves in the foot, but the dark hair and dark eyes is interesting in that it differs from the blond hair and blue eyes that has become what some claim is the defacto description of EAR.
What do you all make of the varying descriptions put out by LE of EAR? Did any of the agencies know one way or the other that he had dark or blond hair, dark or blue eyes, and his age range?