Behavioral differences between EAR and ONS phases
Nov 10, 2014 23:58:52 GMT
playinem and magnumforce73 like this
Post by northernjustice on Nov 10, 2014 23:58:52 GMT
Due to the nature of the crimes during the EAR phase, there were many witnesses who could corroborate different aspects of the EAR's behavior before, during, and after attacks. I believe that even as amateurs we on this board all have a good grasp on who the EAR was when he wore that mask and set out into the night from 1976-1979.
However, when it comes to the ONS phase, we have a lack of witnesses, what seems to be a decrease in EAR-style reconnaissance, and overall less interaction with the victims before the crimes. We don't know what his actual plan was for the aborted Goleta attack, but his MO was overall similar to what he had been doing previously. I think we can assume that he was going to murder the would-be victims given that he chanted that to himself and ended up killing all future victims (that we know of).
Aside from the obvious differences -- murder, removing evidence from the scene, and the different region -- we know something changed. It seems that overall he was much less interested in interacting with his victims and also attacked with less frequency. Did murder satisfy him for longer periods of time? Did it freak him out or make him paranoid, only for the bloodlust to return? Did he have more going on in his life... a wife, a career, or was he serving time in prison or an institution? The EAR (and the VR, if he's to be included) was someone who kept himself busy with his freakish obsession to the point of addiction, so how does someone with a need for a constant compulsive "high" learn to moderate his behavior?
It is hard for me to say that the EAR had some sense of "humanity" from 76-79 given what he did, but what little we know about the ONS attacks show a sense of urgency, struggle, and a barbaric finish that indicate a severe drop in terms of his "humanity". He chose weapons from around the home, likely in advance, with the intent of bludgeoning victims and he also removed his ties, so he obviously had clear intention and wasn't in fact operating from a completely deteriorated, animalistic mental state. But something was different, and what was it?
However, when it comes to the ONS phase, we have a lack of witnesses, what seems to be a decrease in EAR-style reconnaissance, and overall less interaction with the victims before the crimes. We don't know what his actual plan was for the aborted Goleta attack, but his MO was overall similar to what he had been doing previously. I think we can assume that he was going to murder the would-be victims given that he chanted that to himself and ended up killing all future victims (that we know of).
Aside from the obvious differences -- murder, removing evidence from the scene, and the different region -- we know something changed. It seems that overall he was much less interested in interacting with his victims and also attacked with less frequency. Did murder satisfy him for longer periods of time? Did it freak him out or make him paranoid, only for the bloodlust to return? Did he have more going on in his life... a wife, a career, or was he serving time in prison or an institution? The EAR (and the VR, if he's to be included) was someone who kept himself busy with his freakish obsession to the point of addiction, so how does someone with a need for a constant compulsive "high" learn to moderate his behavior?
It is hard for me to say that the EAR had some sense of "humanity" from 76-79 given what he did, but what little we know about the ONS attacks show a sense of urgency, struggle, and a barbaric finish that indicate a severe drop in terms of his "humanity". He chose weapons from around the home, likely in advance, with the intent of bludgeoning victims and he also removed his ties, so he obviously had clear intention and wasn't in fact operating from a completely deteriorated, animalistic mental state. But something was different, and what was it?