Post by Drifter on Dec 2, 2014 5:58:20 GMT
Topic: Bludgeon Murders
Poster: Arch
In reveiwing the FDLE Profile, I am reminded (and this has to be done often now) that the Ventura murders apparently were the EAR/ONS' first bludgeon murders. Because of his inexperience doing so, he spattered himself with the blood of his victims. In the subsequent murders, he covered his victims with bedding or other material before bludeoning them.
This makes a connection to the earlier Goleta bludgeoning less likely, IMO. He would have learned about blood spatter in 1974. Also, the continuum of violence is also out of whack. I thought that it might have been a good lead but in retrospect, it just seems like another of these damned coincidences that have cropped up with annoying regularity.
The choice of bludgeoning his victims MAY HAVE been influenced by the Bedroom Basher, who was active at the time. This is the only part of JJ's EAR A/B theory that I agree with. I think the EAR/ONS was copycatting the bludgeoning aspect of the Bedroom Basher to confuse law enforcement. And that is why he did not stab his victims (which he always had a knife with them AND threatened to use it) or strangle his victims with the ligatures he brought to the crime scenes.
Bludgeoning was a conscious and deliberate decision on his part.
Response from icyu2
Also
Another excerpt from the same book touches on some of the OCD aspects of serial murderers.
"Homicide: A Psychiatric Perspective" 2nd Edition by Carl P. Malmquist, M.D., M.S
"An early attempt at developing a profile of sadistic sexual murderers was done by Robert P. Brittain,8 who was both a forensic pathologist and a psychiatrist. The profile of sexual murderers he developed was that of a male who was younger than age 35 years, introverted, a loner, and with a rich fantasy life. A close, but ambivalent, tie with his mother existed in which she was seen as someone inordinately curious about his sexual life. A distant and punitive father produced a difficult relationship between the father and son. The future murderer was seen as vain and sensitive to threats to his self-esteem as well as having concerns about his sexual potency.
Accounts of cruelties appealed to him, yet a mixture of kind acts would be recorded about him as well. A homicide could occur in the course of a sexual assault, such as by strangulation. In some cases, sexual intercourse itself did not take place; masturbation might occur, or some bizarre type of mutilation, dismemberment, or stabbing. The men Brittain studied were seen as having an intellectual grasp of the crime but showing only a flat and superficial emotional response to it. Whereas some of the preplanning to their acts suggested cunning, they often returned to the scene of the crime and became upset if there was a lack of publicity.
Sexually sadistic individuals have some peculiar characteristics that accompany their offenses. Details about individual fantasies involving torture or arousing sadistic fantasies are important in trying to connect these thoughts with the act of homicide. Some of these individuals engaged in what was referred to by Dietz’s group as excessive driving, in which they would drive long distances with a lack of any clear goal and then abruptly change direction or circle back. This behavior seemed to portray their need to feel free to do as they wished along with the compulsive need to dominate and control others. These individuals exhibited a type of pathological development in the quest for autonomy. Their fascination with police activities and paraphernalia similarly corresponded to their power needs and identifications."
Response from DanCartell
wow that is really interesting especially the bit about excessive driving- it really does raise a few questions and this excessive driving may partially explain a few aspects of this case - could EAR have chosen to strike in Dana Point and ventura as a result of seeing the places during one of these trips?
Since the bludgeoning murders in SoCal were as far up as Ventura and SB county and further down as Orange county AND taking into account the possibility of EAR having indulged in excessive driving (assuming he did like the serial killers in this study) , C1521 may be onto something in his theory of EAR living in LA county . Assuming EAR engaged in execssive driving- the areas he turned up in and offended in radiate from LA xcounty .......
Great stuff- thanks for bringing this information!!
Response from girl_gaara
Mental Illness
Though I still feel I've a ways to go before I fully understand this case, I can chime in on this aspect. I suffer from manic-depression and OCD, many people close to me have had other conditions (especially schizophrenia), and I've been studying sociopathy for a few years now (as part of an unrelated project).
EAR-ONS does strike me as a strong candidate for OCD. That said, there are different levels of severity and we're usually not violent. While it figures into his MO, the banging and ransacking could also be a terror tactic. It's very frightening to be lying in bed, helplessly listening to your abuser rampaging about and making all sorts of racket, let me assure you! Could it be that EAR had a similarly abusive parent and was acting this out, making his victims suffer the way he had? Don't get me wrong; I'm not defending him! Plenty of us abuse survivors don't end up as rapists and killers.
Lithium is one of the few meds I’ve not taken; yet I’m doubtful there’s a connection there. It treats mania, which is the phase most commonly associated with violent outbursts and erratic behaviour. If EAR was bipolar, it had no bearing on his crimes. It can cause an increased sex drive, but it doesn’t make you rape people. Nor should it ever be an excuse to do so.
Despite my still being new to this, I don’t think it would be imprudent to label him a sociopath (Anti-Social Personality Disorder). Sociopaths know right from wrong, but are incapable of guilt, empathy, and fear. Not wanting to get caught shouldn’t be counted as fear or guilt as it has more to do with their urge to continue their behaviour. Ted Bundy is rather the poster boy for violent sociopaths, but don’t discount this solely on the basis of how he differed from EAR. I think EAR and Bundy’s minds essentially worked the same.
It must be acknowledged that though ASPD is a psychiatric disorder, it does not make one legally insane under US law. Sociopaths understand what is means to break the law; they simply don’t care. They think the law shouldn’t apply to them. Some people may consider this evil, but I don’t like to use that term. To me, calling someone evil dismisses them as some kind of monster, rather than a human. I think that it is important to remember we humans are all capable of terrible cruelty, but we must actively choose to be kind.
Compulsion is central to EAR, to have offended so many times in little over one decade. That’s why I have trouble accepting he just stopped. BTK was not nearly as compulsive (I can’t comment on Ridgeway as I haven’t read as much about him).
My sincere apologies if this has already been discussed. I’m only on page 4 of these boards right now.
Response from Sandia
These last posts were VERY interesting. I've not been able to keep up on reading the boards lately and I also just read Arch's post about the 1974 Goleta bludgeoning and it makes sense. I was hoping that particular crime might hold the key, so I'm disappointed but I agree with Arch.
Also thanks to icyu2 and the driving angle and all of your excellent posts, that is something to think about all right.
Girl Gaara, thank you for sharing your insight, that was very informative and it is wonderful to know you have such knowledge and control over your own situation.
Response from Cimmerian10
There were some people in France called the Letterists who referred to this phenomenon as 'dérive.' This really drives home the point, in my mind, that EAR/ONS is a man who has a deep-seated, possibly very sexual conviction in the geographical positioning of inanimate objects and the structures and aesthetics of urban and natural environments.
You can read more about this at the following link... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Situationist_International#Psychogeography
Response from f1guyus
I wouldn't
I wouldn't make this thing too complicated. When EAR moved to SoCal and started killing people he knew that if he offended the way he did in Sacramento the National Guard would have been on every corner. Concentrating his activities in one area in SoCal would have gotten him busted and he knew it. So he spread the crimes out in several jurisdictions and over time. Gave LE the excuse to deny he existed or was offending in their jurisdiction.
Response from girl_gaara
You're welcome. If I can be at all helpful with my personal insight, I'm very glad to give it.
Poster: Arch
In reveiwing the FDLE Profile, I am reminded (and this has to be done often now) that the Ventura murders apparently were the EAR/ONS' first bludgeon murders. Because of his inexperience doing so, he spattered himself with the blood of his victims. In the subsequent murders, he covered his victims with bedding or other material before bludeoning them.
This makes a connection to the earlier Goleta bludgeoning less likely, IMO. He would have learned about blood spatter in 1974. Also, the continuum of violence is also out of whack. I thought that it might have been a good lead but in retrospect, it just seems like another of these damned coincidences that have cropped up with annoying regularity.
The choice of bludgeoning his victims MAY HAVE been influenced by the Bedroom Basher, who was active at the time. This is the only part of JJ's EAR A/B theory that I agree with. I think the EAR/ONS was copycatting the bludgeoning aspect of the Bedroom Basher to confuse law enforcement. And that is why he did not stab his victims (which he always had a knife with them AND threatened to use it) or strangle his victims with the ligatures he brought to the crime scenes.
Bludgeoning was a conscious and deliberate decision on his part.
Response from icyu2
Also
Another excerpt from the same book touches on some of the OCD aspects of serial murderers.
"Homicide: A Psychiatric Perspective" 2nd Edition by Carl P. Malmquist, M.D., M.S
"An early attempt at developing a profile of sadistic sexual murderers was done by Robert P. Brittain,8 who was both a forensic pathologist and a psychiatrist. The profile of sexual murderers he developed was that of a male who was younger than age 35 years, introverted, a loner, and with a rich fantasy life. A close, but ambivalent, tie with his mother existed in which she was seen as someone inordinately curious about his sexual life. A distant and punitive father produced a difficult relationship between the father and son. The future murderer was seen as vain and sensitive to threats to his self-esteem as well as having concerns about his sexual potency.
Accounts of cruelties appealed to him, yet a mixture of kind acts would be recorded about him as well. A homicide could occur in the course of a sexual assault, such as by strangulation. In some cases, sexual intercourse itself did not take place; masturbation might occur, or some bizarre type of mutilation, dismemberment, or stabbing. The men Brittain studied were seen as having an intellectual grasp of the crime but showing only a flat and superficial emotional response to it. Whereas some of the preplanning to their acts suggested cunning, they often returned to the scene of the crime and became upset if there was a lack of publicity.
Sexually sadistic individuals have some peculiar characteristics that accompany their offenses. Details about individual fantasies involving torture or arousing sadistic fantasies are important in trying to connect these thoughts with the act of homicide. Some of these individuals engaged in what was referred to by Dietz’s group as excessive driving, in which they would drive long distances with a lack of any clear goal and then abruptly change direction or circle back. This behavior seemed to portray their need to feel free to do as they wished along with the compulsive need to dominate and control others. These individuals exhibited a type of pathological development in the quest for autonomy. Their fascination with police activities and paraphernalia similarly corresponded to their power needs and identifications."
Response from DanCartell
wow that is really interesting especially the bit about excessive driving- it really does raise a few questions and this excessive driving may partially explain a few aspects of this case - could EAR have chosen to strike in Dana Point and ventura as a result of seeing the places during one of these trips?
Since the bludgeoning murders in SoCal were as far up as Ventura and SB county and further down as Orange county AND taking into account the possibility of EAR having indulged in excessive driving (assuming he did like the serial killers in this study) , C1521 may be onto something in his theory of EAR living in LA county . Assuming EAR engaged in execssive driving- the areas he turned up in and offended in radiate from LA xcounty .......
Great stuff- thanks for bringing this information!!
Response from girl_gaara
Mental Illness
Though I still feel I've a ways to go before I fully understand this case, I can chime in on this aspect. I suffer from manic-depression and OCD, many people close to me have had other conditions (especially schizophrenia), and I've been studying sociopathy for a few years now (as part of an unrelated project).
EAR-ONS does strike me as a strong candidate for OCD. That said, there are different levels of severity and we're usually not violent. While it figures into his MO, the banging and ransacking could also be a terror tactic. It's very frightening to be lying in bed, helplessly listening to your abuser rampaging about and making all sorts of racket, let me assure you! Could it be that EAR had a similarly abusive parent and was acting this out, making his victims suffer the way he had? Don't get me wrong; I'm not defending him! Plenty of us abuse survivors don't end up as rapists and killers.
Lithium is one of the few meds I’ve not taken; yet I’m doubtful there’s a connection there. It treats mania, which is the phase most commonly associated with violent outbursts and erratic behaviour. If EAR was bipolar, it had no bearing on his crimes. It can cause an increased sex drive, but it doesn’t make you rape people. Nor should it ever be an excuse to do so.
Despite my still being new to this, I don’t think it would be imprudent to label him a sociopath (Anti-Social Personality Disorder). Sociopaths know right from wrong, but are incapable of guilt, empathy, and fear. Not wanting to get caught shouldn’t be counted as fear or guilt as it has more to do with their urge to continue their behaviour. Ted Bundy is rather the poster boy for violent sociopaths, but don’t discount this solely on the basis of how he differed from EAR. I think EAR and Bundy’s minds essentially worked the same.
It must be acknowledged that though ASPD is a psychiatric disorder, it does not make one legally insane under US law. Sociopaths understand what is means to break the law; they simply don’t care. They think the law shouldn’t apply to them. Some people may consider this evil, but I don’t like to use that term. To me, calling someone evil dismisses them as some kind of monster, rather than a human. I think that it is important to remember we humans are all capable of terrible cruelty, but we must actively choose to be kind.
Compulsion is central to EAR, to have offended so many times in little over one decade. That’s why I have trouble accepting he just stopped. BTK was not nearly as compulsive (I can’t comment on Ridgeway as I haven’t read as much about him).
My sincere apologies if this has already been discussed. I’m only on page 4 of these boards right now.
Response from Sandia
These last posts were VERY interesting. I've not been able to keep up on reading the boards lately and I also just read Arch's post about the 1974 Goleta bludgeoning and it makes sense. I was hoping that particular crime might hold the key, so I'm disappointed but I agree with Arch.
Also thanks to icyu2 and the driving angle and all of your excellent posts, that is something to think about all right.
Girl Gaara, thank you for sharing your insight, that was very informative and it is wonderful to know you have such knowledge and control over your own situation.
Response from Cimmerian10
There were some people in France called the Letterists who referred to this phenomenon as 'dérive.' This really drives home the point, in my mind, that EAR/ONS is a man who has a deep-seated, possibly very sexual conviction in the geographical positioning of inanimate objects and the structures and aesthetics of urban and natural environments.
You can read more about this at the following link... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Situationist_International#Psychogeography
Response from f1guyus
I wouldn't
I wouldn't make this thing too complicated. When EAR moved to SoCal and started killing people he knew that if he offended the way he did in Sacramento the National Guard would have been on every corner. Concentrating his activities in one area in SoCal would have gotten him busted and he knew it. So he spread the crimes out in several jurisdictions and over time. Gave LE the excuse to deny he existed or was offending in their jurisdiction.
Response from girl_gaara
You're welcome. If I can be at all helpful with my personal insight, I'm very glad to give it.