Post by Drifter on Dec 15, 2014 6:36:43 GMT
Familial DNA
AL SEIB, AP'Grim Sleeper' case may affect O.C. murder probes
July 08, 2010|By SALVADOR HERNANDEZOrange County authorities are attempting to use familial DNA to solve two cold investigations, a relatively new and controversial tactic used by Los Angeles police in the notorious "Grim Sleeper" case
And while a 57-year-old man faces trial accused of killing at least 10 people in South Los Angeles over a span of 20 years, Orange County officials said the use of familial DNA will likely be put to the test as well, affecting criminal investigation across the country.
Familial DNA is a controversial and rare approach to indirectly identify suspects, and Lonnie Franklin Jr. Is the first suspect identified by it in California, authorities said.
When using familial DNA, which was first authorized in California in 2008, DNA retrieved from crime scenes is used to identify people who could be family members of a suspect, giving investigators an indirect way of finding the actual criminal.
In Orange County, officials have petitioned the Department of Justice twice to use the same DNA search method, said Elizabeth Thompson, DNA lab director for the Orange County Crime Laboratory. Among those cases submitted was the "Original Night Stalker," a serial killer believed to be responsible for several deaths across California, including four in Orange County during the 1980s.
12 Replies
1673 Views
Flag
Add feed to My Home
View Feed
Profile Image
By PortofLeith
Member
2 years ago
954 Posts
Recent Replies
Second Arrest
The arrest was only the second in California to use the DNA of a suspect's family member, and supporters of the technique said it illustrated its merits.
www.mercurynews.com/california/ci_17809194?nclick_check=1
The Santa Cruz search was the 13th time California had used familial DNA since approved in 2008.
Flag
Quote
Quote
Edited by JaneDoe, 2 years ago
Profile Image
By JaneDoe
Member
2 years ago
366 Posts
Sounds Like
Somebody has a suspect.
Flag
Quote
Quote
Profile Image
By f1guyus
Member
2 years ago
1270 Posts
ACLU
Should DNA be collected on people arrested on suspicion of felonies without a judge's order? I believe a judge will give an order for EARONS when they find him. Collect - Test - Match - Game Over. Oh, what a beautiful morning....Oh, what a beautiful day......
Flag
Quote
Quote
Profile Image
By JaneDoe
Member
2 years ago
366 Posts
The worst part is...
testing the DNA of potential EAR suspects could take a long time to do since newer cases obviously take precedent.
The reason why LE found the Grim Sleeper at all was because his son was arrested and it was his sample that surprisingly brought back a match. Otherwise the Grim Sleeper would, to this day, still be working in the police station garage.
The EAR would need a sibling, a parent, or a child to have recently been arrested, in order for these results to immediately pop out to LE.
Flag
Quote
Quote
Profile Image
By MovieMan
Member
2 years ago
297 Posts
Familial DNA
Making new law here. Lots of contending interests. And the recent revelations about the ability of lab techs to alter DNA in the lab make it obvious to me that the whole familial DNA question is going to be the subject of controversy. And legislation, and lawsuits, and court decisions and appeals and reversals and........slap....slap.....Thanks, I needed that. Best case we find out who EAR/ONS was. Can't happen soon enough.
Flag
Quote
Quote
Profile Image
By f1guyus
Member
2 years ago
1270 Posts
New Frontier in Law Enforcement
The ACLU sued and are awaiting the outcome on privacy issues. Elvis Garcia is going to fight his case on privacy issues and isn't Franklin fighting too? I hope the judge agrees that "The concerns about privacy are theoretical, but the results are real". There should be a judge's order for collection in all cases. I see a steamroller with powerful scraper bars pushing EARONS to the front of the line! LE can catch them but can the State keep them? Let's all hope so. The ACLU will fight for civil rights that protect the innocent and end up helping the criminal.
Flag
Quote
Quote
Profile Image
By JaneDoe
Member
2 years ago
366 Posts
ACLU
Bless the ACLU for remaining a critical voice in defense of civil liberties and the individual's right to privacy.
However, the larger the DNA databank, the better. Is it possible that DNA evidence can erroneously convict someone? Hell, almost anything is possible, and the Jane Mixer/Gary Leiterman case is pretty questionable. Yet, innumerable false convictions have been the result of a criminal justice system in which DNA profiling did not yet exist, and a substantial number of innocents have been exonerated as a result of DNA. Something like Prop 69 can only exonerate the innocent and apprehend the guilty. Potential for abuse and failure, as with anything, is there, but given the way this particular science (DNA profiling) works, it's remarkably, remarkably small. I'd like it if the ACLU would back off on this particular issue.
Flag
Quote
Quote
Profile Image
By SpeakelOfEngrish
Member
2 years ago
1090 Posts
Six Degrees of Separation
We may be all closer to the EAR/ONS that we'd like to believe.
Flag
Quote
Quote
Profile Image
By MovieMan
Member
2 years ago
297 Posts
Re: Six Degrees of Separation
EARONS turn yourself in.
LE is waiting and you can show them how you tie knots.
They'll take you to a nice room at the Jail, no shoe strings attached.
You'll see an arraignment Judge, he'll help you with your navigator flashlight.
EARONS, you will get a Trial and you can even try on your mask!
They will let you have lubricant in Prison!
Flag
Quote
Quote
Profile Image
By JaneDoe
Member
2 years ago
366 Posts
Re: New Frontier in Law Enforcement
Posted By: JaneDoe
The ACLU sued and are awaiting the outcome on privacy issues. Elvis Garcia is going to fight his case on privacy issues and isn't Franklin fighting too? I hope the judge agrees that "The concerns about privacy are theoretical, but the results are real". There should be a judge's order for collection in all cases. I see a steamroller with powerful scraper bars pushing EARONS to the front of the line! LE can catch them but can the State keep them? Let's all hope so. The ACLU will fight for civil rights that protect the innocent and end up helping the criminal.
Normally I'd agree with you, but have you checked out their website? LOL You'll see what I mean when you do.
Flag
Quote
Quote
Profile Image
By ladyofthelake
Member
2 years ago
209 Posts
Re: New Frontier in Law Enforcement
Hi lady,
I'm not sure what you're asking me to look at on the ACLU web site. I know they fight the system on many issues, but thank God they don't make the decisions.
Flag
Quote
Quote
Profile Image
By JaneDoe
Member
2 years ago
366 Posts
Some updated info. on DNA testing in CA
Copy and paste this link for additional information dated May 9, 2011: I thought this was an interesting article. Apparently it costs about $20,000. for the process. CA is doubling their efforts in funding 2 per month. There is currently one case in the works. I think it said there are eight more "in line." www.latimes.com/news/science/la-me-familial-dna-20110509,0,1393484.story?page=2&utm_medium=feed&track=rss&utm_campaign=Feed%3A%20latimes%2Fnews%2Fscience%20%28L.A.%20Times%20-%20Science%29&utm_source=feedburner
Flag
Quote
Quote
Profile Image
By ladyofthelake
Member
2 years ago
209 Posts