Post by danmiami on Sept 6, 2014 16:18:41 GMT
danmiami posted:
Hi Sandia,
This may be one of the reasons LE failed to disclose the General Custer letter (trying to give them the benefit of the doubt here). I would bet that the letter was in no way "accidentally dropped" near one of the rape scenes. In fact I am not even sure where they found this letter? Sacramento? Anyway could it be possible that LE already identified who wrote the letter and it was another setup job by EAR? I am more inclined now to state that this letter may have resulted in another wild goose chase. It may have potentially narrowed down the list of those who had had access to it. But I doubt it was left there accidentally. Just like the "Mommy" comments were nonsense at the scenes. Another attempt at throwing off LE. Remember the profile "a chronic manipulative liar". This is one trait I am 100% (not 99.9%) he possesses on a day to day basis.
Wow Dan, I had never considered what you just said. It is my understanding that after new information on the case and renewed activity, some on the ball detective dug out the map and journal and Custer paper from an evidence locker where it has been sitting all these years. I wonder if it was because Michelle McNamara was going around interviewing various LE departments or because of other renewed publicity and activity on the case that got them relooking at things again.
It is my understanding that this evidence is connected to the October 9, 1978 Danville rape and was found nearby where he had apparently parked his get away car by a railroad track. How nearby I am not sure, blocks away I would imagine.
I had never considered that it was dropped on purpose.
Why would he be carrying around a journal ranting against a 6th grade teacher and the Custer Homework assignment with him in a car he planned on using as a getaway car from a crime scene? He undoubtedly used cars he bought for cash and did not register and he had to know he might have to abandon the car and run and he no doubt thought about what would be in the car that could lead to finding him.
Could it be homework from his own childhood, or the homework left in the car from someone he bought the car from? Somehow I doubt he himself had a child, but that is a possibility. I have no doubt the map is his work.
How did it drop out of the car? Was he uncharacteristically careless, or was he in a panic running, or as you say was it on purpose? Why have it in the car in the first place. I could understand if the homework/journal was from a previous owner and the map could have been from a current attack he was planning though. As you say, could it be it was the intent to implicate someone we don't know about but that LE in that jurisdiction might know about? Wow, this is one of the strangest mysteries within a mystery in this case along with the 8/29/76 walking away with no pants episode. Could you be right? So perplexing and strange!
Yes, I agree, he probably is to this day a chronic, manipulative liar.
Yes I ripped LE for not disclosing the letter to the public and they should have disclosed it anyway in my opinion. But I do not believe a thing that this sicko ever told his victims. "My main man needs silver and gold!". "I just need money and food for me and my girlfriend". "my van outside". "You looked good at the officers club". "Mommy you mother@cker!". All of it is probably nonsense and an attempt to divert attention away from himself. Also in the profile, "Will rarely admit fault and also blame others for his actions". Well there you go!!!