Post by foxmulder on Jan 9, 2017 12:33:24 GMT
I think that when all is said and done, if EAR is ever captured, it will come out that he knew the first victim in some way, or lived very close to her.
Perhaps I am considering it too logically, but I do think that the FIRST has some significance. Out of all the women he stalked, hundreds perhaps, he chose this one to be first. It wasn't opportunistic; as we've seen, rape of vulnerable women came easy to him. I believe there is a certain significance to who she was that made him choose her to be his first victim. I wish we could know about her and who she was in 1976. What she looked like; what she was like in her personal life in this period; what her family was like (what did they do, income level, etc); her circle of friends and associations. These I believe would hold clues that could lead to EAR. I think something was missed in the original investigation perhaps.
Consider:
-He attacked her bottomless. Partially nude. She never saw any pants. He made himself vulnerable, in a sense, to her. No matter who you are, even if you're the most confident person in the world, a certain vulnerability comes to being nude. It's part of our DNA. He made himself in a sense vulnerable to her.
-He attacked again in his third attack just doors away from her. The same block, basically. Again, in this third attack on that block, he is (for the second and last time) nude from the waist down. We should try to determine if there were similarities between the first and third victim (be they physical; social circle; shared hobbies or activities or shared hang-outs; similar income level perhaps - some common tie).
Correct me if I am wrong but I do not think he ever struck again on the same block.
These are his earliest rapes. They hold significance.
We should look into people who lived in the surrounding blocks in that period;
If there were any houses for sale on that block or the surrounding blocks in the summer of 1976 (If he didn't "live" on the block, one such house might've served as his lair).
The key to solving this case lies in Rancho Cordova. Something in my gut just tells me so.
Perhaps I am considering it too logically, but I do think that the FIRST has some significance. Out of all the women he stalked, hundreds perhaps, he chose this one to be first. It wasn't opportunistic; as we've seen, rape of vulnerable women came easy to him. I believe there is a certain significance to who she was that made him choose her to be his first victim. I wish we could know about her and who she was in 1976. What she looked like; what she was like in her personal life in this period; what her family was like (what did they do, income level, etc); her circle of friends and associations. These I believe would hold clues that could lead to EAR. I think something was missed in the original investigation perhaps.
Consider:
-He attacked her bottomless. Partially nude. She never saw any pants. He made himself vulnerable, in a sense, to her. No matter who you are, even if you're the most confident person in the world, a certain vulnerability comes to being nude. It's part of our DNA. He made himself in a sense vulnerable to her.
-He attacked again in his third attack just doors away from her. The same block, basically. Again, in this third attack on that block, he is (for the second and last time) nude from the waist down. We should try to determine if there were similarities between the first and third victim (be they physical; social circle; shared hobbies or activities or shared hang-outs; similar income level perhaps - some common tie).
Correct me if I am wrong but I do not think he ever struck again on the same block.
These are his earliest rapes. They hold significance.
We should look into people who lived in the surrounding blocks in that period;
If there were any houses for sale on that block or the surrounding blocks in the summer of 1976 (If he didn't "live" on the block, one such house might've served as his lair).
The key to solving this case lies in Rancho Cordova. Something in my gut just tells me so.