Post by locard on Aug 4, 2017 22:30:01 GMT
Of course I understand DNA evidence. And I probably am much older and much fatter.
This thread isnt about milestones. But if you want to talk about milestones, think of all the milestones that the Marine's family got to enjoy because of Janelle's death. In this thread it doesnt matter how many women in the US are raped. It only matters that Janelle was allegedly raped and before she could bring up charges she was raped and murdered again. Notice I have to keep on saying "allegedly". Because her allegations died with her on that day.
You have an assumption that earons did everything he did because he was a psychopathic rapist/killer. You also have an assumption that because of that, there are no other possible connections to his victims. You seem to think that earons was in a vacuum, without social contacts, steady employment, or other aspects of a normal life. And yet there is no proof of that.
The DNA doesnt explain everything in the case. It doesnt explain motive. It doesnt explain the ransacking, or the burglaries, or the phone calls, or the poem, or why he moved from Nocal to Socal, or why he chose his victims, or how he chose his victims, or why he would shoot some and bludgeon others, or a whole multitude of other questions. This thread specifically deals with how earons chose Janelle. And why. The DNA is not in question here. The DNA does not prove or disprove how earons chose Janelle. And this thread specifically proposes that the allegations had something to do with it. This other stuff you continually post is extraneous to the topic of this thread.
While it is very sad what Janelle went through allegedly at the hands of the Marine, there is no evidence to point to him as being responsible for her death at the hands of the serial killer. Your other theories about the Goleta and Ventura murder victims are also precarious. But feel free to submit an online tip to the F.B.I. or call in and see what they think of your theories. www.fbi.gov/wanted/seeking-info/unknown-suspect-21/@@download.pdf
Albion: "You have an assumption that earons did everything he did because he was a psychopathic rapist/killer. You also have an assumption that because of that, there are no other possible connections to his victims. You seem to think that earons was in a vacuum, without social contacts, steady employment, or other aspects of a normal life. And yet there is no proof of that."
I do think that EAR/ONS/GSK is a pyschopath. I haven't, however, previously commented to you about what I think about his job, employment, etc. Here's my take on him. I think he was born and raised in an upper middle-class family, perhaps in Los Angeles County (since he tiptoed around that county and didn't seem to commit any murders there but committed them in Ventura and Orange counties). I think he went to college, most likely in Northern California. I think he is disciplined, methodical, and talented. I think he applies those skills to his every day life. I think he commuted to the Northern California rapes and he didn't rape women in the county where he lived because he didn't want to be suspected and identified. I think he was born in the mid-1950's. I think he probably moved to Santa Barbara County after college, most likely for work. He took a 5-year gap between 1981 and 1986. He could have been out of the area or in a relationship with a woman. Whenever he goes through loss, perhaps the break-up with a woman, he calls a former rape victim and threatens her. It's probably a way for him to avoid dealing with pain and loss.
I also think he has friends and hobbies. I think he comes across as unassuming.
Why do you think such a smart, talented guy got on this path?