Post by jd on Nov 14, 2017 18:55:37 GMT
Hello - Newbie to the Forum, but not to the case. I have been reading about it for a few months now. very interested in going through this forum to learn more. I've always had a few questions about the community meeting.
If the police were going to have this meeting, why didn't they use it as an opportunity to find the suspect as well?
Why did the police, and maybe they did, not survey the crowd who attended and at the very least ask for peoples ID who came to the community meeting? Were there other pictures taken of the meeting. I know there is the famous one that we have all seen, but were there other pics on that roll that were not printed? Or other video?
Perhaps, at the time, the police were not aware that the suspect would have wanted to attend the art of meeting, thinking he wouldn't have wanted to get caught, but it seems like the perfect place to set a trap for him.
Set up two perimeters. One would have been a check point where all cars and people were video taped coming into the parking lot and building and people I.D.'s were checked.
The second would have been out side of that parameter where anyone who came to the meeting, but left before going inside would have been picked up and questioned.
If the EAR came to the meeting and realized they were checking ID's and turned around and left he would have been picked up, if he had given his ID and attended his face would have been on camera (camera could have been set up at entrance where ID's were checked).
Sadly, I assume this was happening during a time when these sorts of enforcement measures were not thought of or considered.
I realize this is all hind-sight and does not help the case at all. But a lot of my job focuses on avoidance of risk and I can't help think, if measures were taken at this meeting all the subsequent crime and terror might have been avoided.
This might be addressed already in another thread. As i said I'm a newbie to the forum and currently reading as much as I can to get caught up.
Thank you -
JD
If the police were going to have this meeting, why didn't they use it as an opportunity to find the suspect as well?
Why did the police, and maybe they did, not survey the crowd who attended and at the very least ask for peoples ID who came to the community meeting? Were there other pictures taken of the meeting. I know there is the famous one that we have all seen, but were there other pics on that roll that were not printed? Or other video?
Perhaps, at the time, the police were not aware that the suspect would have wanted to attend the art of meeting, thinking he wouldn't have wanted to get caught, but it seems like the perfect place to set a trap for him.
Set up two perimeters. One would have been a check point where all cars and people were video taped coming into the parking lot and building and people I.D.'s were checked.
The second would have been out side of that parameter where anyone who came to the meeting, but left before going inside would have been picked up and questioned.
If the EAR came to the meeting and realized they were checking ID's and turned around and left he would have been picked up, if he had given his ID and attended his face would have been on camera (camera could have been set up at entrance where ID's were checked).
Sadly, I assume this was happening during a time when these sorts of enforcement measures were not thought of or considered.
I realize this is all hind-sight and does not help the case at all. But a lot of my job focuses on avoidance of risk and I can't help think, if measures were taken at this meeting all the subsequent crime and terror might have been avoided.
This might be addressed already in another thread. As i said I'm a newbie to the forum and currently reading as much as I can to get caught up.
Thank you -
JD