Post by roberson on Mar 18, 2018 11:15:01 GMT
I've read that EARONS dropped his bike and went NORTH into the school parking lot. I've made lengthy posts here mentioning that same event. Where did I read that he went north instead of south? Quester? One of the books?
Oh no. Now I'm wrong. Again. I'm so tired of thinking I know something about this case, arguing a POV based on faulty knowledge.
It's getting really old.
Now I've learned that EARONS went SOUTH. Here's the reddit:
www.reddit.com/r/EARONS/comments/6uxz8z/the_attack_of_jennifer_horinek_and_abraham_himmel/
A creek bed? Really? I hadn't heard that one before. Heard he jumped a fence but is there a creek bed immediately north or south of San Patricio? No.
Not that I can see.
Here's an image ostensibly depicting that version of events:
I can't even make sense of that mess. Who is GK? Golden State Killer? What drunkard came up with this version of events?
Here's another account:
Okay, so now it's south, into the neighborhood and not the school yard. I've not heard this variation yet, either, until now.
And here are two images depicting the route
sites.google.com/site/jjmcgr/perilsofbadinformation
So now I know. Is there anything else I need to know before once again spouting off incorrect information?
Any other sites I should visit? Any other books I should read? Or should I just keep operating on whatever I encounter, no matter how wrong it is?
How about a DEFINITIVE narrative of this man's crimes and activities, from beginning to end? No mistakes, no errors, no conflicts, no falsehoods, no legends or innuendos.
Just the facts. The absolute true unvarnished facts. One place. One site. One uncontaminated narrative. Is that possible?
Thanks.
Oh no. Now I'm wrong. Again. I'm so tired of thinking I know something about this case, arguing a POV based on faulty knowledge.
It's getting really old.
Now I've learned that EARONS went SOUTH. Here's the reddit:
www.reddit.com/r/EARONS/comments/6uxz8z/the_attack_of_jennifer_horinek_and_abraham_himmel/
THE PRACTICE ATTACK
He was almost caught before the string of killings. The date was Oct. 1, 1979. It was a cool autumn evening in Goleta, a suburb north of Santa Barbara where murders rarely occur. Computer programmers Jennifer Horinek and Abraham Himmel were awakened by man who pried the kitchen door. At knifepoint, he threatened to kill them. He forced Horinek to tie her boyfriend up, then tied her up. He led Horinek into the living room and pushed her to the floor. He swung his flashlight up and down her naked body, fantasizing about her, then left the room. He returned seconds later, put tennis shorts over her head and declared: "Now I'm gonna kill you - cut your throat." Then he left the room again, apparently to stage a burglary. Horinek got up and, with her ankles bound, hopped toward the door. She tripped before she got there. She finally got out and screamed for help. The killer quickly chased her down and dragged her back inside. Next door, neighbor Stanley Los - an FBI agent - heard the screams. He grabbed his gun and went downstairs. Himmel, assuming his girl friend had gotten away, managed to wiggle out of the bindings. He made his break for freedom out a back door. The killer realized he had lost control. He raced away on a bicycle he had stolen. Los retrieved his car keys. But his car didn't start. He tried again. And again. Finally. Too much time passed. He couldn't find the killer. Then, a few miles away, as he flipped a U-turn, he saw reflectors in his headlights. Los sped toward the man, and jumped out of his car to chase him. But the killer jumped a fence. And disappeared into a creek bed.
The suspect left behind important clues: The serrated kitchen knife, the 10-speed bike, the size 8.5-9 Adidas Runner footprints. And police had a description: young, white, about 5-foot-10, dark hair, a knife pouch on his belt. Horinek and Himmel would be his only known survivors. They didn't return calls seeking comment for this story.
He was almost caught before the string of killings. The date was Oct. 1, 1979. It was a cool autumn evening in Goleta, a suburb north of Santa Barbara where murders rarely occur. Computer programmers Jennifer Horinek and Abraham Himmel were awakened by man who pried the kitchen door. At knifepoint, he threatened to kill them. He forced Horinek to tie her boyfriend up, then tied her up. He led Horinek into the living room and pushed her to the floor. He swung his flashlight up and down her naked body, fantasizing about her, then left the room. He returned seconds later, put tennis shorts over her head and declared: "Now I'm gonna kill you - cut your throat." Then he left the room again, apparently to stage a burglary. Horinek got up and, with her ankles bound, hopped toward the door. She tripped before she got there. She finally got out and screamed for help. The killer quickly chased her down and dragged her back inside. Next door, neighbor Stanley Los - an FBI agent - heard the screams. He grabbed his gun and went downstairs. Himmel, assuming his girl friend had gotten away, managed to wiggle out of the bindings. He made his break for freedom out a back door. The killer realized he had lost control. He raced away on a bicycle he had stolen. Los retrieved his car keys. But his car didn't start. He tried again. And again. Finally. Too much time passed. He couldn't find the killer. Then, a few miles away, as he flipped a U-turn, he saw reflectors in his headlights. Los sped toward the man, and jumped out of his car to chase him. But the killer jumped a fence. And disappeared into a creek bed.
The suspect left behind important clues: The serrated kitchen knife, the 10-speed bike, the size 8.5-9 Adidas Runner footprints. And police had a description: young, white, about 5-foot-10, dark hair, a knife pouch on his belt. Horinek and Himmel would be his only known survivors. They didn't return calls seeking comment for this story.
Not that I can see.
Here's an image ostensibly depicting that version of events:
I can't even make sense of that mess. Who is GK? Golden State Killer? What drunkard came up with this version of events?
Here's another account:
After calling 911, Stan Los crossed his lawn towards the long driveway that led to the victims' residence. As he reached the driveway, the attacker, mounted on the bike, sped past Mr. Los. Stan only got a fleeting look at him. He was not wearing a mask. He was wearing a plaid shirt of the Pemberton style with a darker grey/ blue tint to it, and jeans and tennis shoes. The cyclist turned left (west on Queen Ann). Los ran to his car, an older, FBI-issue sedan. The car was parked in front of his home facing east on Queen Ann. He started it and it initially stalled out, something it did often. He started it again, this time successfully, did a U-turn in front of his house and headed off after the man on the bike. He crossed a dried up stream bed just to the west on Queen Ann and took the first left (south) onto Kellogg, as going straight led to several dead ends. A short distance down Kellogg he came to its intersection with San Patricio, which ran to the right (west). A short distance down San Patricio he saw the biker in his car lights and turned to pursue. The biker, who was now about 200 yards down San Patricio west of Kellogg, jumped the bike onto the sidewalk on the left (south) side of the street and then abandoned it and the kitchen knife he had used to threaten the victims and fled on foot, jumping over a fence into a backyard. SA Los did not continue to pursue because his police radio indicated the deputies were fast approaching the area and the main street, Cathedral Oaks, was only a block away and he felt the police would catch the criminal there.
And here are two images depicting the route
sites.google.com/site/jjmcgr/perilsofbadinformation
So now I know. Is there anything else I need to know before once again spouting off incorrect information?
Any other sites I should visit? Any other books I should read? Or should I just keep operating on whatever I encounter, no matter how wrong it is?
How about a DEFINITIVE narrative of this man's crimes and activities, from beginning to end? No mistakes, no errors, no conflicts, no falsehoods, no legends or innuendos.
Just the facts. The absolute true unvarnished facts. One place. One site. One uncontaminated narrative. Is that possible?
Thanks.