Post by justasking on Mar 26, 2018 5:22:43 GMT
As pointed out, there were some occasions which might indicate this sort of a picture.
But if he killed the supposed female accomplice, I'd make a guess that her body wouldn't have been tied up and bludgeoned. That sort of an act would have been a matter of survival for him (if we suppose his motive would indeed have been to "silence" the woman), which would make it more likely something more "functional", just a quick matter of "disposing of" her.
If she really was some kind of a "companion", then his relationship with her was more personal. The invasion into other people's homes and brutally murdering them brought him gratification by virtue of him being a complete outsider, which made the 'invasion' from the outside absolute. If he was to murder a person who he was already mutually involved with in some way, I'd surmise his M.O. would differ to that degree. If it was personal, it would then probably seem that much more impersonal. If it was some kind of a girlfriend for example, then what would he care about the gratification of murdering her? He had already "got" her as a partner, and he only aimed for persons and scenes he didn't "have" instead.
So I guess it would be something like a gunshot. With a mask covering his face he commits the fetish deeds, but without the mask it's a practical matter. And gunshots were what killed the Maggiores too, which also seemed to have been a survival situation, and not for the "thrill" (again, the necessary disclaimer; if we suppose he killed them, and so on...). That sort of a precedent could point towards a gunshot as the method of "silencing her".
But this brings us to an interesting question. Maggiores were shot in a sudden situation and just left were they fell as their killer escaped. The ONS victims were murdered in their homes for the reasons of perversion. But they too were just left there, to be found from their beds. He had no intention to try and dispose of the bodies. But what would he do if he had a companion, who exceptionally was mobile in accordance to his own movements and whereabouts? He would have a variety of options regarding the time and place for killing her. We have no precedent for his methods in that sort of a scenario, but is there anything to be surmised in that regard, based on his other known methods in different situations and for different reasons?
Would this be a body to be found or not? Don't know, but most likely she would have been reported as "missing" at least. Even prostitutes (and I'm not intending the word "even" to refer to some lower worth as a human being, but just in reference to the general "grey" societal status) are usually reported as missing, by someone.
But if he killed the supposed female accomplice, I'd make a guess that her body wouldn't have been tied up and bludgeoned. That sort of an act would have been a matter of survival for him (if we suppose his motive would indeed have been to "silence" the woman), which would make it more likely something more "functional", just a quick matter of "disposing of" her.
If she really was some kind of a "companion", then his relationship with her was more personal. The invasion into other people's homes and brutally murdering them brought him gratification by virtue of him being a complete outsider, which made the 'invasion' from the outside absolute. If he was to murder a person who he was already mutually involved with in some way, I'd surmise his M.O. would differ to that degree. If it was personal, it would then probably seem that much more impersonal. If it was some kind of a girlfriend for example, then what would he care about the gratification of murdering her? He had already "got" her as a partner, and he only aimed for persons and scenes he didn't "have" instead.
So I guess it would be something like a gunshot. With a mask covering his face he commits the fetish deeds, but without the mask it's a practical matter. And gunshots were what killed the Maggiores too, which also seemed to have been a survival situation, and not for the "thrill" (again, the necessary disclaimer; if we suppose he killed them, and so on...). That sort of a precedent could point towards a gunshot as the method of "silencing her".
But this brings us to an interesting question. Maggiores were shot in a sudden situation and just left were they fell as their killer escaped. The ONS victims were murdered in their homes for the reasons of perversion. But they too were just left there, to be found from their beds. He had no intention to try and dispose of the bodies. But what would he do if he had a companion, who exceptionally was mobile in accordance to his own movements and whereabouts? He would have a variety of options regarding the time and place for killing her. We have no precedent for his methods in that sort of a scenario, but is there anything to be surmised in that regard, based on his other known methods in different situations and for different reasons?
Would this be a body to be found or not? Don't know, but most likely she would have been reported as "missing" at least. Even prostitutes (and I'm not intending the word "even" to refer to some lower worth as a human being, but just in reference to the general "grey" societal status) are usually reported as missing, by someone.