Post by rozb on Apr 26, 2018 18:36:14 GMT
Hi Sertum
good post and agree with most of what you write here. I would just point out that most serial killers there is a sexual component to their crimes. they used to call them Lust Murderers I believe. There is a certain sexual thrill that they achieve even if there is no overt sexual component to their crimes. This guy was exhibiting this even in his Visalia Ransacker phase. the going through womens underwear, looking at pictures, stealing trinkets. and of course escalated to rape and murder later. interesting that the his murders started with murders of self preservation-claude snelling and the maggiores.
I agree with you on the why he probably stopped-age and having daughters and being a single dad. its a myth that serial killers cant stop, or will only stop due to death, incarceration or moving away. good post.
good post and agree with most of what you write here. I would just point out that most serial killers there is a sexual component to their crimes. they used to call them Lust Murderers I believe. There is a certain sexual thrill that they achieve even if there is no overt sexual component to their crimes. This guy was exhibiting this even in his Visalia Ransacker phase. the going through womens underwear, looking at pictures, stealing trinkets. and of course escalated to rape and murder later. interesting that the his murders started with murders of self preservation-claude snelling and the maggiores.
I agree with you on the why he probably stopped-age and having daughters and being a single dad. its a myth that serial killers cant stop, or will only stop due to death, incarceration or moving away. good post.
It is very poor information and the FBI and psychological associations have dismissed them. The APA has a new study under review I believe that started in the mid-to-late 90s exploring it much more in depth. Also, taking into account factors and subjects not in original studies. First instance murderers, juveniles, domestic violence and murders by criminal organizations.
What I think is a major problem today, especially for women, is how they are misled to believe that "sex" is an uncontrollable compulsion for some men causing murder. It is as if people believe the defect is in a sexual manifestation just like a criminal manifestation.
That is simply not the case. If the "compulsion" or "urge" was so overwhelmingly uncontrollable, there would be no advanced premeditation and preparation. For instance, let's just take EARONS. If it was lust, coveting a woman for sexual gratification, then all the preparations and risks were unnecessary and could in fact get in the way of his goal. If he wanted to get off, he risked so much more that could interfere with the goal. There were easier targets, without police looking and husbands home. Many women even said he wasn't aroused or didn't climax. When he broke in and subdued them, he took his time ransacking and preparing. It's like, and I'll even say I believe he worked himself up to raping the women because it was more for shocking them and using rape to terrorize them and the community.
You're absolutely correct that crimes can have sexual components. But sex is not the motive or some sexual mental defect is the cause of murder. I believe murderers will use rape in their repertoire to torment, humiliate and terrorize their victims.
So yes, sex may be a component in murder or a crime, but not the cause. Too often Hollywood portrays these killers as some guy who is just so horny and needs to kill for gratification. Years ago that was accepted belief by LE, profilers and the general public. So much so, they would tell women and girls to "dress down" and watch "the make up".
My point is, all evidence and data today spanning all violent crime types that has a sexual component, the crime is not caused or rooted in sex. It is rooted in the person's hatred towards an individual or a group/type of people.
Even when you look at rape that occurs between an abuser and his victim in a domestic violence situation, the rape wasn't due to the "need/urge/thirst" to get laid. It is to overpower and dominate the victim.
One of the biggest problems in the late 1800s and early 1900s is that sex in America was and still is demonized. So authorities have long tried to make sex evil and the root cause of crimes and misdeeds. In reality, sex is not the cause of these women getting killed. Just like rape is due to a man just wanting to get off. Yes, sex may be a component in order to shock, terrorize, humiliate, degrade or simply dominate a victim. It is not the cause.
Viturally in all cases of serial murder, domestic violence and even murder in general, the victims have less or no value to the offender and the offender has almost always had a history of violent behavior in response to situations.
Yes, the old data profilers took was from an era where religious/political beliefs tainted and corrupted actual facts. Serial killers are known to be liars and manipulative sociopaths, yet Douglas and co seem to think they got honest responses. That on top of turn-of-the-century data from an era when sex was considered evil.
There is no doubt that sex is a component in many crimes. Nothing suggests it is the cause other than in puritan like beliefs and offenders trying to sell LE and the public that the urge is just "uncontrollable".
I think you're throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Sex could have been over-emphasized at a certain point, but it's puritanical to toss it out from henceforward as a "cause." You can rethink the driving cause of serial killings without relegating sexuality to the bygone past.