Post by starsky on Jul 17, 2019 7:27:21 GMT
Luftec was a banned poster and noted fraud prior to JJD. But I found some of his pre JJD posts intriguing, so I copied them down. From his first post, his clear goal is to prove that the VR was not EAR. Luftec also claims to have worked for LE, even in Visalia. If Luftec were JJD, is it possible at some point JJD helped investigate the EAR case? Rather than summarize the posts, just look at some:
"Hi folks, I'm new here but not to the VR and EAR cases. The biggest thing for me is the physical differences between VR and EAR, VR is big calved, and on heavy side and had what more then one witness said was a strange run, bow legged but like knees were close together, I know that makes no sense the way they are saying it but what it tells me he has a distinctive run and under stress of fleeing it is not likely a fake run. The EAR is a thin build and leaps fences with much greater speed and agility then VR. I believe the VR was an older male as well, I believe the utility worker who transferred to Davis right after the flashlight shooting incident that was contacted in Davis was the VR, just couldn't prove it.
The EAR in 1974 was just starting his breaking into homes and stealing women's underwear somewhere around 14 or 15 years old. So yes I am saying I believe the EAR in June 1976 was 17 or 18 years old when he committed his first known attack.
I quick deal on me, I do not want to share too much personal info but I will include this. I have worked hundreds of burglaries loads of reports, evidence is my specialty when it comes to break ins, I can tell how the bad guy got in, unlocked window,forced window or door, lock pick, homeowners key, various prying methods and the big one door kick (those are easy to spot). I work real hard discovering and developing physical evidence, latent fingerprints, DNA, fibers and statements. Been doing LE for long time not just burglaries of course but those are important ones to locating sexual home invading predators, NO I do not know everything, I want to know more that is why I'm here to ask smart people questions and opinions and gain insight that I may have never thought of myself and the EAR case is my white whale , like many others on this board I would imagine. I want this man to pay for his crimes, he has caused so much pain and suffering and its not fair to his victims to not know his name.
"
------------------
"My take on this is no names of victims should be used, I have worked in LE in three of the jurisdictions the EAR attacked in and (I know almost every name in every attack and only for investigation purposes), there is no reason to to list a victim of a sexual assault ever! I would never tell or list anyone who had been victimized by the EAR even if they gave me permission to do it. They have been through enough already."
------------------
Luftec takes care to point that LE confirmed that EAR's penis was avg, not small:
"The Sheriff's spokesman Miller, started this small penis thing early in the investigation in interviews with press. I do not know if it was administration approved or not it was done as a tactic to develop interaction with EAR, they wanted to insult him to get something going, since they did not really have much in the way of physical evidence at the time. ... the Department did later admit his penis was considered average and they had in fact embellished or taken the liberty to say it was small.
------------------
"There were many witnesses including sheriff's deputy's who chased the EAR, there were Police officer's who also chased the VR, that is where the body types are not even close to similar"
----------------------
"I go by the physical description of the two, comparing all witness statements not just cops that chased them although they had some of the best views running after them. I thought at one time same guy, I do not now, they are two different guys. VR was was home invader underwear perv, who was going to be a kidnapping rapist/murderer. The EAR started out as a underwear perv, who got bored and wanted more and more, he escalated his and stayed in their homes."
------------------------
"That difference of descriptions between EAR and VR, EAR with Military Bearing (I don't really know what they mean,I believe straight backed with purposeful walk?) and VR having bowed legs or something about running with knees together, a funny walk and or run, explains to me two different men. This along with evidence of them working at the same time in their own areas."
-------------------------
"I have just a point, I went to high school in the East area of Sacramento, in high school..it was a three year high school, I was only in yearbook the first year, I missed the other picture day and did no senior portrait, so only in year book one year... I was a ghost I guess, not on purpose but just what happened." [was JJD in his yearbook his junior and senior years? Just checked Classmates, in fact, JJD went to a 3 year East Sac high school--Folsom (62,63,64). And he is only in the Folsom yearbook his sophomore (or first) year--this could be interesting]
-------------------------
"[regarding the VR] I do not know, if they are the same guy in my mind. There are missing pieces for me in the form of differences. I also worked at the department that the VR was thought to have moved too [is this a slip?] , a few years after and I saw his pic in the old case file. I believe that was the guy based on what I read.
I just don't know, also because I believe EAR was in Rancho at that time committing burglaries in 1974, 1975,1976.
"
"Hi folks, I'm new here but not to the VR and EAR cases. The biggest thing for me is the physical differences between VR and EAR, VR is big calved, and on heavy side and had what more then one witness said was a strange run, bow legged but like knees were close together, I know that makes no sense the way they are saying it but what it tells me he has a distinctive run and under stress of fleeing it is not likely a fake run. The EAR is a thin build and leaps fences with much greater speed and agility then VR. I believe the VR was an older male as well, I believe the utility worker who transferred to Davis right after the flashlight shooting incident that was contacted in Davis was the VR, just couldn't prove it.
The EAR in 1974 was just starting his breaking into homes and stealing women's underwear somewhere around 14 or 15 years old. So yes I am saying I believe the EAR in June 1976 was 17 or 18 years old when he committed his first known attack.
I quick deal on me, I do not want to share too much personal info but I will include this. I have worked hundreds of burglaries loads of reports, evidence is my specialty when it comes to break ins, I can tell how the bad guy got in, unlocked window,forced window or door, lock pick, homeowners key, various prying methods and the big one door kick (those are easy to spot). I work real hard discovering and developing physical evidence, latent fingerprints, DNA, fibers and statements. Been doing LE for long time not just burglaries of course but those are important ones to locating sexual home invading predators, NO I do not know everything, I want to know more that is why I'm here to ask smart people questions and opinions and gain insight that I may have never thought of myself and the EAR case is my white whale , like many others on this board I would imagine. I want this man to pay for his crimes, he has caused so much pain and suffering and its not fair to his victims to not know his name.
"
------------------
"My take on this is no names of victims should be used, I have worked in LE in three of the jurisdictions the EAR attacked in and (I know almost every name in every attack and only for investigation purposes), there is no reason to to list a victim of a sexual assault ever! I would never tell or list anyone who had been victimized by the EAR even if they gave me permission to do it. They have been through enough already."
------------------
Luftec takes care to point that LE confirmed that EAR's penis was avg, not small:
"The Sheriff's spokesman Miller, started this small penis thing early in the investigation in interviews with press. I do not know if it was administration approved or not it was done as a tactic to develop interaction with EAR, they wanted to insult him to get something going, since they did not really have much in the way of physical evidence at the time. ... the Department did later admit his penis was considered average and they had in fact embellished or taken the liberty to say it was small.
------------------
"There were many witnesses including sheriff's deputy's who chased the EAR, there were Police officer's who also chased the VR, that is where the body types are not even close to similar"
----------------------
"I go by the physical description of the two, comparing all witness statements not just cops that chased them although they had some of the best views running after them. I thought at one time same guy, I do not now, they are two different guys. VR was was home invader underwear perv, who was going to be a kidnapping rapist/murderer. The EAR started out as a underwear perv, who got bored and wanted more and more, he escalated his and stayed in their homes."
------------------------
"That difference of descriptions between EAR and VR, EAR with Military Bearing (I don't really know what they mean,I believe straight backed with purposeful walk?) and VR having bowed legs or something about running with knees together, a funny walk and or run, explains to me two different men. This along with evidence of them working at the same time in their own areas."
-------------------------
"I have just a point, I went to high school in the East area of Sacramento, in high school..it was a three year high school, I was only in yearbook the first year, I missed the other picture day and did no senior portrait, so only in year book one year... I was a ghost I guess, not on purpose but just what happened." [was JJD in his yearbook his junior and senior years? Just checked Classmates, in fact, JJD went to a 3 year East Sac high school--Folsom (62,63,64). And he is only in the Folsom yearbook his sophomore (or first) year--this could be interesting]
-------------------------
"[regarding the VR] I do not know, if they are the same guy in my mind. There are missing pieces for me in the form of differences. I also worked at the department that the VR was thought to have moved too [is this a slip?] , a few years after and I saw his pic in the old case file. I believe that was the guy based on what I read.
I just don't know, also because I believe EAR was in Rancho at that time committing burglaries in 1974, 1975,1976.
"